America still provides access to the American Dream to all people. How can I defend, challenge, or qualify this statement by using ethos, pathos, and logos?

There are a few things to consider when completing this task. The first step is to understand how certain rhetorical tools you need to use fit into your problem.

Proof from the spirit is based on discussion of speaker characteristics. It is two. The inner atmosphere is specific to the way you speak or express yourself. This includes using reasonable inferences and correct grammar to indicate that you are educated and trustworthy, not to exaggerate, but to do a well-thought out balanced assessment Yes. The external spirit is the actual personal history and certificate. Here you can talk about whether your parents have realized America's dream and how to talk about your own prospects.

Proof from the logo means proof by argument. This is completely different from "pragma" (Greek means "fact"). When reading Aristotle's rhetoric or rhetorical textbook there are various kinds of logical arguments, such as deductive (entim), induction (example or symbol), and increasingly smaller general topics. Large or predefined.

Your first logical point is that the statement that "all" people can get American dreams can be rebutted by counter-example. Discussion that most people can still use it can argue or disagree, but an important logical point is that general argument (using the term "all") refutes counter-example That is enough. Therefore, you can use the article of Nate Rawlings to prove the problem encountered by "dreamers" to realize the American dream, especially when Donald Trump developed a very large number of immigration prevention policies I can do it. The second example is Al Szekely, as described in Ehrenreich's article. By considering whether the definition of the American dream is a moving target, you can see the problem definition and increasingly less problem. For example, 40 years ago, television was considered a luxury item and there was no phone.

Sorrow includes evoking the audience's emotions. You can use a perceptual example to explain this. For example, after the current government tried to raise many social safety nets, you can see that your family is bankrupt because parents suffer from cancer and children are born with disabilities . You may be sorry for the elderly who no longer enjoyed meals on the wheel. Therefore, because there is no single payer health care system and social safety net, sorrow can be used to evoke sympathy for families who can not participate in American dreams.

The United States offers a number of programs to support people in need such as medical insurance and Medicaid, but because there are a lot of people who can not access life, the United States is still facing a problem for "tired poor" I think that I am offering American dreams. The basic needs of this type of elp are not available and live in poverty. In the United States today it is difficult to focus on problems such as debt problems and poverty caused by the war crisis around the world. People lost their foundation and began to become American dreams. Studs Terkle showed the world the inhumane acts that Roberto Akuna presented in his book "Roberto Akuna is talking about farm workers". "He reveals obstacles you have to overcome in order to gain something for yourself and you must strive hard to fully grasp the gratitude gained from your needs and needs It will not.

Homework Your task is to combine your own observations with at least three to five sources and keep America's chance to offer American dreams, challenge or restrict. In this question, we need to integrate various sources (3-5) into coherent, well-written discussion. Your discussion should be core; your source and your observation should support this argument.

Your mission is to create at least three (4 honor) materials and materials to defend, challenge or limit the US opportunity to still provide American dreams for "retired, poor, crowded people" It is to integrate your own observations. In this question, we need to summarize various sources (minimum 3, minimum 4 honors) into coherent, well written discussion. Please refer to the source and use your own observations to support your position.