America's Abandonment of Natural Law

Abandonment of the American Declaration of Independence to the Natural Law was dull: "We believe these truths are self-evident: Every human being is born equally, the Creator gives them life, freedom, And the pursuit of happiness.The origin of these rights is "... ... the law of nature and the law of nature ..." (Independence Declaration). The founder used the principle of natural law as the basis for the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

British legal expert, Sir William Blackstone, believes that the root of common law in the UK is the law of God. Blackstone's view influenced many founder of the United States; Jefferson's assertion on "the law of nature and the god of nature" in the Declaration of Independence is a reference to the idea of ​​Blackstone. Democracy debt to Christianity is underestimated ... Before Rousseau was heard before a long century, or rock or Hobbes (sic), the New Testament clearly stated the basis of democracy. Principles detailed by the early father including St. Augustine

The heart of the American Declaration of Independence and the Principle of Natural Rights is that human law must be based on a higher moral order. This declaration proclaims the existence of "the law of nature and the god of nature". This has a clear meaning in the 18th century England and the United States. It refers to the will of God being shown in the world's natural order. John Rock, widely read by college American leaders, has written in his second paper on the government: .... It must follow the laws of nature, the will of God . "

The University of Salamanca reexplained the concept of natural law. It is a law born in nature, and all laws where natural law coexists in this law. Their conclusion is that, given that everyone has the same nature, they also enjoy the same rights to life and freedom. These views constitute novelty in European ideas, contrary to the notion that the indigenous peoples of the Americas, which are dominant in Spain and Europe, do not have such a right. If resources are limited, the best choice value is chosen if you need to choose from a number of mutually exclusive choices. Suppose you think of the "cost" of making the best choice, that is not enjoying the benefits of the second best choice. The New Oxford American dictionary defines it as "when choosing an alternative, other alternatives may lose potential benefits"