Allegorizations of the Active and Contemplative Lives in Philo, Origen, Augustine, and Gregory

Faro, Origen, Augustine and Gregory's allegorical life of an aggressive and meditative life In this article, we discuss about the allegorical interpretation of several Bible pairs working with Filo, Origen, Augustine and Gregory To do. Meditation life is related. As shown, Augustine combines the elements of the first two writers and forms his parable of the two wives of Jacob as a representative of an active and meditative life. In Philo, most of the basic elements of Christian 's thought on active and meditative life existed.

Many famous early Godfather and Christian writers, including Origen and Augustine, have not regarded the history of creation as a fable and theological reality, as the creation myth of Genesis depicts ordinary sunny days . Some early Jews also made allegorical interpretations of Genesis. The most famous one was the time of creation (III.13). Earth support has gradually declined among scientists and philosophers, since the 18th century, the Enlightenment era, the scientific revolution, and the discovery of new scientific discoveries. In particular, discovery of geology requires a planet more than a thousand years ago. And Neptune of Abraham Gottlob Werner suggests trying to incorporate the understanding of the geological survey into a coherent account of the natural history of the earth.

Faro, Origen, Augustine and Gregory's allegorical life of an aggressive and meditative life In this article, we discuss about the allegorical interpretation of several Bible pairs working with Filo, Origen, Augustine and Gregory To do. Meditation life is related. As shown, Augustine combines the elements of the first two writers and forms his parable of the two wives of Jacob as a representative of an active and meditative life. - God's doctrine of coincidences is the truth of natural religion, and the trinity doctrine is to reveal the truth of religion. Various deity systems provide discussion about sacred existence, unity, and attributes, but they are no longer being implemented. They have not insisted and tried to prove that the supreme beings are indispensable

Gregory's interpretation principle is to distinguish the story of Biblical poetry (history) from its spiritual contemplation (theory). In the tradition of Philo (World Creations 1.1 - 2.12) and Origen (the first principle of IV - 1.1 - 3.5), he advocates several arguments in favor of the parable of the Bible. (1) It is practiced by Christ, (2) Paul recommends it, (3) makes the channel useful, otherwise it becomes immoral; (4) unable to understand the channel or Impossible (Song Song Preface). This program is obviously based on the need to integrate the Bible throughout the matrix of secular knowledge. Gregory never doubts that this matrix should be internally consistent; he unconsciously adopts two contradictory rules.