Aligarh and Deoband Movements

Shah Waliullah's Renaissance is aimed at rebuilding the political, social, economic and spiritual aspects of Muslim society. But in order to achieve these reforms, he must change the way Muslims and the lives of intellectuals. Because after the departure of Aurangzeb, Muslims in India were adversely affected and they lost the glory of control. We need to relocate Muslim intellectuals. Muslims are addicted to immoral Hinduism behavior. They do not know anything about Muslim. In addition, there are many differences between Sunnis and Shiites.

The movements of Aligarh and Deoband are separated, and its purpose and strategy are clearly opposite. Aligarh is not a religious movement, Muslims emphasize receiving Western education. It places more emphasis on Western education so that Muslims can enter into government services to compete with Hindus in political and economic areas. Because of pressure on Western education, Aligarh completely ignored the religious side, so I did not make an effort! Strengthen religious aspects of Muslim society. Because of this policy, Aligarh graduates are seriously lacking in religious education and can not develop religious tendencies. Tehrik-i-Deoband provides educational services for Muslims, which is a purely religious movement that emphasizes religious education. Deoband seminary is completely incompatible with modern educational trends

After the establishment of Tehrik-i-Deoband, Aligarh's work strategy did not have direct dialogue with the Aligarh movement. The Aligarh movement is based on a policy of reconciliation with the UK, but Tehrik-i-Deoband emphasizes religious aspects of Muslims and is against the policy of reconciliation with the UK. A totally different approach to politics has broadened the gap between the Deoband authorities and the alegal authorities. Maulana Muhammad Qasim, leader and important person of Deoband, has argued with Sir Sy Syh Ahmad Khan yet. They have big differences in the political affairs of the country. Maulana Qasim and his colleagues actively fought with the UK and founded their own government in their own field for a while for a while. On the other hand, Sir Syed Ahmed was very active during the war of 1857, but he remained faithful to Britain. Maurana racid Ahmad Ganggo