Alexander Hamilton's "Federalist no. 78"

In a federalist. 78 Hamilton explained the authorities and duties of the judiciary as prescribed in Article 3 of the Constitution. Article 3 of the Constitution is very ambiguous about the structure of the federal court. Hamilton had to convince Americans that the federal court would not be a problem. He said that the Federal Court would not have unrestricted powers, but they said they would play an important role in the Constitutional Government. Hamilton limits judicial powers by defining it as an explanatory power of text constraints.

However, the Alexander Hamilton of the Federal Democratic Party 78 expressed the view that the court only grasped the power of the words, not the enforcement of the other two government departments that the Supreme Court relies on. Then in 1820, Thomas Jefferson expressed a deep reservation to the doctrine of judicial review: you think the judge is the ultimate arbitrator of all constitutional problems; it certainly is a very dangerous doctrine And that is the place to place the doctrine of oligarchy under dictatorship. Our judge is as honest as any other male, it is not more than that. Like everyone else, they have the same passion for parties, power, and military privileges ... their powers become increasingly dangerous as they are holding power It is getting. control

Balance to prevent excessive power concentration in every government department. In Federal Document No. 78, Alexander Hamilton skillfully described the court as "public law and public security." Our long and fair and equitable justice system is one of the main reasons for our government system. For example, many people around the world are trying to emulate. The federal judicial court of this country plays an indispensable role in securing the safety of citizens freedom, security, and constitutional enactment. This is a balance to prevent separation of power and excessive power concentration on every part of the government. In Federal Document No. 78, Alexander Hamilton skillfully explained the court as "notarization of public law and public safety." Our long-term fair and equitable justice system is one of the main reasons our government system has become an example. The world seeks to obey the suit