Albert Cohen's Theory

The real problem for Cohen is that the opportunity is not disturbed but the position is disappointing (Siegel, 2013). Young middle-aged people are enthusiastic about getting approval and status, but they are frustrated because they can not meet the middle class standards (Crime Study Chapter 4 Outline sagepub.com). They are overly sensitive to any perceived threats. They also risk, violate the law, and are willing to despise middle-class treaties. Cohen's research explains factors that promote and maintain delinquency in subculture. The retreat of his position and the concept of measurements of the middle class indicate that social forces are promoting and maintaining illegal occupations, not personal characteristics.

I believe that the first of the three theories that can explain the bad life style of Whiteberger is Albert Cohen's illegal boy theory. According to Portsmouth University, Cohen's research and theory of results are the limitations he observed in Robert Merton's theory of theory and the reaction to simplification. Cohen thinks that criminal actions are part of the reason for not being able to achieve the goal, but that Merton 's crime, which is personal and income based and can occur in any socio - economic context I do not agree with the assumption.

The latest strain theory is Robert Agnew's 1992 general strain theory. The theory of Agnew relies heavily on previous version of strain theory, especially Robert Merton, Albert Cohen, Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin, David Greenberg, and Delbert Elliott and his colleagues. But Agnew pointed out several kinds of stocks that were not considered in these earlier versions and provided a more comprehensive discussion of the conditions that the stock is most likely to lead to crime. Money may be the central goal of the United States. We encourage poor people and wealthy people to work hard so that they can make a lot of money. Furthermore, money is necessary to purchase a lot of necessary items such as necessities and luxury goods. However, many people can not obtain the necessary funds by legal means such as work. This applies not only to the poor but also to many middle class people with high goals.

The theory of different opportunities is a combination of tension, social collapse and differential relevance theory. Like Albert Cohen in front of them, Richard Kliner and Lloyd Olin tried to understand the development of criminal organizations. Unlike Cohen, they do not see the response of the gang to middle class values. In fact, they think that this is a process that is completely independent from the middle class. They feel people will join the gang to find economic opportunities. They said that the community's organization will determine the level of economic opportunities. This is closely related to neighboring stability. This level of stability can determine the type of gang that can be formed. The idea is that because legal opportunities in the economy are limited, illegal opportunities also apply. Therefore, there is competition for criminal behavior. This led to the development of three groups: -