Akbar vs. Aurangzeb

Dead - October 27, 1605 compares the effect of the religious unity policy implemented by Akbar and Aurangzeb. Akbar's religious unity policy - all his religious policies are based on surreal (peace and all)

- Akbar proposes Din-i-Ilahi (holy faith). And it incorporates the principles of all religions. Akbar's policy effect Din - i - ilahi (Holy Belief) 's influence There has never been a true believer as an official heritage. However, its ideal laid the foundation for the tolerance policy of the Mughal empire as a whole. Abul Muzaffar Muhi - Muhammad Aurangheb

Death - On March 3, 1707, Aurangzeb's religious policy influenced Aurangzeb's policy - people were disappointed with Hinduism. The influence of Aurangzeb was to force his Hindu to convert to Muslim. But this only causes more violence

- The empire expanded to the south; they participated in various wars with Patan, Sudanese, Golconda, Marathas and Ahomus. Therefore, the degree of control will be long, and he will make more people Muslims. This led to the expansion of the civil war, the Mughal Empire expanded beyond the limits of government control. Sulh-i Kull policy relieved India from the murder of theocracy and attempted to put secular countries together through a common citizenship bond. - His government is closely tied to Islam

- Restore Mughal's military rule and use it to strengthen Muslim as a dominant religion. This work quotes "Akbar - Wikipedia, free encyclopedia". N. p., N.d. Web page February 18, 2013

"Aurangzeb - Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. N. p., N.d. Web page February 18, 2013

"Oran Zebu, the commonality of history with Akbar." Historical politics. N. p., N.d. Web page February 18, 2013

"Akbar's religious policy" Free encyclopedia and portal on Indian culture and lifestyle. N. p., N.d. Web page February 18, 2013

"Akbar's Religious Policy - CSS Forum" CSS Forum - Preparation for CSS Examination and Pakistan Civil Service. N. p., N.d. Web page February 18, 2013

Through this free and enlightened policy, Akbar has succeeded in ensuring perfect cooperation in all of these subjects. This strengthened the stability of the empire, it became large in Akbar. However, Aurangzeb changed the wise and benevolent policy of his predecessor. Aurangzeb removed many Hindus from the state government office, reinstated Jizya, strongly took additional insults, even infringed on their religious feelings. This religious intolerance policy created inevitable consequences of Hindu alienation. The alienation of Hinduism is one of the strong factors that have led to the decline of the Mughal Empire. Due to prejudice and intolerance of Aurangzeb, Akbar was extinct as a goodwill of Hindus.

In Plingle Kennedy's words, "What did Acber got ... he (Olansee) failed," observed Dr. Sugit Mansin (1998) in Indian history dictionary. "Among contemporary historians, the Austrian rule on the intention of India believes that Islamic countries draw Shibaji's Malata's rebellion as an early stage of Indian nationalism, but Aurangzeb believes that his own It is certain that his empire collapsed soon, with words "dead and poverty" dying and passed away.

Despite his efforts to build an empire based on tolerance, Akbar's diverse vision for Mughal society is short-lived. His grandchild Aurangzeb and ruler of Mughal emperor complete the religious tolerance completely by re-running jizya and taking measures to dismantle the Hindu temple. Shortly after the rule of Aurangzeb, Mughals was quickly invaded by the British who conquered the split Indian subcontinent and imposed their tradition and value on the Mughal population. After all, in the life of Emperor Akbar, when tolerance is dominated, society prospers, when tolerance does not exist, the empire tells us that we did the same.

Emperors of Mughal, Akbar and Aurangheb have gained a good reputation from the rulers of extensive control. Both have exceptional qualities of heart and soul. They are brave, hardworking, energetic, and have leading military talents. But their views and personality are more obvious than similar points. The policy between Akbar and Aurangzeb is quite contrastive. Akbar did not place religion under political interests. He realized the best good intentions and moral support to conquer the Hindus. Therefore he built a marriage relationship with the royal family of Rajputana, removed all kinds of insults against non-Muslims, and did not hesitate to appoint the appropriate Hindu for the government's position of responsibility.