Agreeing With Russell's Analyses of Sentences and Refuting Strawson's Objection

Introduction In this article I analyzed that the analysis of sentences by Russell was successful and that Strawson's objections could be counter-argued. Russell 's explicit description theory contains important insights that Russell' s view, at first glance, is that the reference proposition is actually correctly quantified. Russell 's Explicit Descriptive Theory Russell proposed two arguments. One is about name and the other is about explicit description. In this paper, we explain Russell's explicit description analysis "F" and its theory of correct logical analysis.

Russell's theory is an application of the use of explicitly described attributes in the speech and Strauss's argument to Russell is based on the concept that he does not recognize explicit descriptions, I ignore it. Theory also has problems. . (Cohen, 2008: 2) Also, because the reference condition can not be satisfied as a direct use statement, since the true value is different, the difference between the use of the reference and the use of the attribute is deeper. The result of the preset is different in each case. When using an attribute, the assertion fails because the condition of the reference destination can not be satisfied, but it may still have a true value in the reference sense. Speech acts may be misleading

Introduction In this article I analyzed that the analysis of sentences by Russell was successful and that Strawson's objections could be counter-argued. Russell 's explicit description theory contains important insights that Russell' s view, at first glance, is that the reference proposition is actually correctly quantified. Russell 's Explicit Descriptive Theory Russell proposed two arguments. One is about name and the other is about explicit description. In this paper, we explain Russell's explicit description analysis "F" and its theory of correct logical analysis.

This article is intended to introduce Russell's explicit description theory. The main contents of this paper are as follows. A clear explanation of the definition, a clear explanation of the puzzle, the definition of Russell of the explanation theory, how the theory solves the puzzle, against Strawson 's theory against this theory, I objected to Strawson Russell' s deterministic description My evaluation of persuasive power evaluation and persuasive power of the theory What is a clear explanation? A clear explanation is usually a phrase written in the form of "some", and "some" is a singular noun.