Against Happiness by Jim Holt

Jim Holt failed to mark happiness as another social evil in 'New Zealot's New York Times' Sunday newspaper article 'Anti-happiness' on June 20, 2004. In this article, Holt says, "People with sadness are very good, angry people are very different, and strangely, happy people are often very irritated." Despite argument contrary to intuition, this is definitely an interesting participatory discussion, but Holt did not convince me of the happy "dark side".

Mr. Jim Holt, author of "Why the world exists" stated that "Neger always raises troublesome arguments, even if you are wrong," said the best in explaining the origins of the universe Philosophers and cosmologists. Best seller "Here we point out that there is something important in the world we live, not scientific images of the world, although science tends to master, but it is not so." Controversy. However, in a calm style, Mr. Nagel extended the view of consciousness to a comprehensive criticism of the modern scientific world view called his "heroic victory of ideological theory beyond common sense." Value is not a coincident feature of the life on the earth but a fundamental aspect of the universe. Mr. Nagel saw the beginning of "cosmic tendency", not seeing random evolution.

Another person's voice is science writer Jim Holt. In his "New York Times Magazine" article, "Good instinct: why is everyone altruistic?" He describes the general assumption that altruism is best understood as a selfish genetic impulse Doubted. He pointed out, as philosopher Thomas Nagel pointed out, there may be rational and objective altruistic reasons based on the grounds that "the concept of self as a person is equally true". The implication here is that it does not require a selfish genie to incorporate altruism into the brain. At our calm, more mature moment, our philosophy and rational aspects of our thoughts can accomplish this task. We are a group of philosophers - they are completely separated from our biological factors - they can act perfectly according to the ethical rules of physical logic.

If you can save a complete innocent child by killing an innocent child. . . Part 2

Kant's revision of Comptonism reveals Jim Holt's statement in some inscriptions on this page, namely New York's book review "Platonism miraculates mathematical knowledge". He wants to know "if human beings are in a world beyond Platonic, how human thought relates to mathematical subjects". Perhaps he knows, but we are not going to mention Plato's own view that we will be led by the world view during our life and then reborn. Or, he does not know, or I do not think it ridiculous to think of this theory. But, as I think Plato thinks, our reality was born out of transcendence, and since then it has not been separated, I think he is completely unaware of this neoplatonic fix. With this in mind, the new platonic world theory can certainly be called supersensation perception.