After the Holocaust, Vows of Never Again are Broken Again and Again

Prejudice is a human being, but it may be forgiven, but prejudice is not so. There are various ideas about why genocide continues at this sad pace and the actions we have to take to protect our promises. Some people think that the international community does not act to allow massacres and tragedies, but acts not to identify indifference or neutrality as compliance. Absolute reliance on others is part of the problem while other countries may play a role in the resolution of genocide.

After the Holocaust, world leaders vowed that they would never wait "never again" and millions of innocent people were slaughtered. But in Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda, Guatemala, Timor-Leste, Darfur, genocide repeatedly occurs - the unstable situation of today's world may expand to similar terrorist incidents. During the Ottoman Empire, the dominant Turks lost 75% of their territory in a few weeks with a huge military defeat. Refugees will recover from the hunger and crisis of losing their land. Because the government needs scapegoat, they condemn everything to dangerous Christians - especially the Armenians. As a result, 1.5 million Armenians were massacred in 1915.

After the Holocaust, the international community vowed to the evil of the world and vowed to "never forget" and "never ever" to allow massacre to happen. Approximately 1 million Rwandans murdered in 1994 witnessed the emptiness of such speech. Fortunately, we have no more to repeat erroneous negligence, but the international community must be able to do more to cope with genocide. If the United States and its allies take action today to stop the massacre of Yazidis in addition to saving lives, the world shows that we remember past genocide, and everywhere Take action to prevent the destruction of threatened people.

Every year, at Yom Ha 'Shoah ("Holocaust Memorial Day"), the phrase "Never Again" is full of enthusiasm. But that also happened. It has been happening all the time. Syria, like Sudan, is the latest example of a meaningless and meaningless massacre. Unlike genocide in Rwanda and other recent memories, the crisis in Sudan and Syria is taking place in the "social media era", so we can not claim to be ignorant. What motive can prove pain, death, and sorrow, that is, the loss of all generations? Forget the cards; this has been going on for a long time. But when we do things in the 21st century, how does the United States assert that our moral grounds were what President Wilson did in the middle of the 20th century?