After the Cold War: American Foreign Policy in the 1970s

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader

Analysis and interpretation of trends in American foreign policy since World War II. After discussing the competition theory of foreign policy and the development review during the Cold War, we will discuss current development in US foreign policy, including arms control, nuclear proliferation, human rights, regional intervention and conflict management, foreign aid, environmental policy and other major countries Focus on the problem. Relationships including Germany and the European Community countries, Japan, Russia, China

Since the 1970s human rights issues have become increasingly important in foreign policy of the United States. Congress initiated in the 1970s. After the Vietnam War, Senator Donald Fraser (D, MI) said that when major international organizations and sports subcommittees criticize the foreign policy of the Nixon Republic, the American foreign policy and traditional American values I grabbed the difference. Management In the early 1970s, Congress terminated the Vietnam War and passed the War Strength Act. As part of the growing confidence of Congress on many aspects of foreign policy, human rights issues are the battlefields for the legislative and executive bureaus in formulating foreign policy. David Forsythe pointed out three concrete, early parliamentary counterarguments that inserted his own views on foreign policy.

From the beginning of the First World War to the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy often played the role of the Messiah and Savior. However, with the passage of time and the emergence of the Cold War, the American foreign policy is to make plans for the interests of the United States, to enter the World War II to retaliate, to invest in France through monopoly expansion It turned to an imperialistic tendency including doing. America rescued the world for democracy and regained the stability of the European economy; however, in so doing America abuses her role as a savior and a recovery person, and hence the imperialist I got a title.

Novikov and Servan-Schreiber advocated social, economic and political views on the globalization of the Cold War era, and thought foreign policy of the United States is imperialism. Clearly, if American foreign policy acts in an imperialist way during the Cold War and interferes with the spread of democracy, globalization can not provide democratic opportunities, but it will change with the disappearance of the Cold War Do you? According to Benjamin Barber and Samuel Huntington, the confrontation of old ideologies has diminished and globalization has increased. Barber revealed that Jihad and Mike World did not give great hope to the citizens who are trying to control the democratic methods they are practicing (Barber, 1). He uses the term "world of the world" to describe the political globalization of the new world (post Cold War) and classify it as four requirements. It is market, resource, information technology, and ecology.