Administrators Must Know When to Investigate Further

In the administrative field, information literacy plays an important role in developing risk management methods, expanding policies, and sharing information. In any environment, in order to succeed in management it is necessary to have knowledge and ability to know when to need further investigation. Administrators need to use past facts to find problems and to evaluate them to form realistic conclusions. Effective research and data mining often creates unachievable insights when information literacy methods are ignored.

Prior to appointing a knowledgeable and experienced murder investigator to the past leadership position, the leadership position or administration should play a small or little existing role in the actual investigation. The role of the government is not to conduct an investigation, but to establish and reaffirm the main purpose of arresting continuous killers, and to support investigators. The FBI (2008) recommends the completion of a memorandum to promote resource support and commitment in different jurisdictions for investigation. Egger (1998) is moving one step further by recommending the completion of a mutual assistance agreement, which is a written agreement to support surrounding jurisdictions as necessary. By doing it in advance, you save time and resources available for investigation.

There should be a difference in responsibility between managing the incident and investigating the incident. The task of the survey is the responsibility of the chief scientist. The government provides all necessary support including equipment procurement, financing, and personnel. For example, task group administrators need to obtain permission to request service priorities from forensic labs and other service providers. Principal researchers and administrators of the working group need to have close cooperative cooperative relationships while maintaining their own responsibility.

If the survey continues, the needs for the team's human resources will increase for a variety of reasons, such as an increase in the number of investigators and support staff. In order to avoid the use of surplus personnel, constraints must be enforced by the Task Force administrator. As mentioned earlier, it may be effective to reduce the number of people. The lead researcher is best to check when additional personnel is needed. Administrator's responsibility is to approve permanent or temporary redistribution of the requested number of personnel to the task force.

The nature of internal investigation collecting evidence. In the event that a particular claim is initially judged as a criminal or administrative nature, the interior investigator may decide whether the evidence collected after the initial decision will change the nature and scope of the investigation It is important to review the decisions during the investigation. . If the nature and scope of the survey is changed, investigators must prepare to change the methods and procedures used to reflect the new focus. For example, if an investigator initially determined that the allegation was a matter of disciplinary action but concluded that there was the possibility that an investigator could have criminal acts due to subsequent evidence, the investigator could use a method suitable for administrative investigation And stop using the procedure and just before further action