ADJUDICATION MACHINERY UNDER THE INDUSTIRAL DISPUTES ACT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS

As part of the industrial dispute law, the ruling or forced arbitration system was in India. In India, this ruling system should fill the gap caused by the weak trade union movements in history, which is not enough to negotiate on an equal footing with the employer. However, this system has been criticized for adverse effects on trade union movements. Excessive dependence on trade union movements deprived the union of motivations to organize with strong grounds and unions simply made petitions and litigation organizations to debate their case in the courts.

* Judgment: According to OGC, the term "judgment" is almost exclusively used to solve dispute settlement under Part 2 of the 1996 Housing Allowance, Construction and Recycling Act (HGCR), and the bill passed Judgment is not allowed until it is done. Form ADR Under this, the contract must include the award criteria, and the judge will make a decision within 28 days after submission. The ruler's decision will be binding until it reaches the final decision through agreement, arbitration, or litigation. Otherwise, the parties can use the ruler's decision as the final decision. For these reasons, this decision is different from other forms of ADR, ADR is optional and there is less link to a single subject field. Like lawsuits and arbitration, judgment is also a process of conflict. Table 1 shows the pros and cons of the judgment.

Ruling Rule: According to Mr. Hart, the best way to combat inefficiency is to make certain people the arbitrator of conflict. The selection criteria of the judges and the proper procedures of the awards should be clearly defined by the approval of the rules. The role of these arbitrators in this system is that these decisions must be in accordance with applicable laws. These judges also adopt the correct punishment procedure so that all offenders charged with the same crime are not discriminated on the severity of punishment.

Kleros is an open source project whose purpose is to create a decentralized organization to determine disputes. The social goal is to bring transparency, affordable, quick arbitration to numerous disputes. Cleiros will bring justice to unfair people, as we sometimes say, the cryptographic currency brings banking work to people without bank accounts. These funds can only be used to achieve the purpose of the cooperative, that is to promote the development and adoption of the Kleros platform. The token sales funds can not be distributed as dividends to team members or other applications not related to cooperative purposes.