Ad Hominem (Abusive)

(Aka: personal abuses, personal attacks, insults, sources of curses, insults, ironic objections, against people, for people)

Explanation: If the attack on one person is completely unrelated to the person's ongoing assertion, please attack the claimant rather than insist on himself

Proposal of tax cuts from my opponent is a good idea - it's from a woman eating bent and jelly pint every evening!

Explanation: Because of the fact that women like ice cream have nothing to do with tax cuts, it has nothing to do with the discussion. When people can not find an appropriate argument debate, they usually attack for despair.

Tony wants us to believe that the origin of life is "accident". Because Tony is a rude SOB and spends more time in prison than the church, there is the only way that you need to consider to create a license plate.

Explanation: Tony may be a ruthless SOB. Perhaps he spends more time on the joint than the church, but it has nothing to do with the assertion or credibility of his argument about the origin of life.

Exception: If an attack on a person is related to the discussion, this is not a paradox. In the first example, we point out that her eating habit is strong evidence of conflict of interest, if the problem under discussion is to tax only Ben and Jerry ice cream.

Tip: If another person attacks you, please regard it as a tribute to the quality of discussion. This is usually their desperate performance.

Advertising insults attack people 's age, personality, family, gender, race, social or economic status, personality, appearance, attire, behavior or occupational, political or religious beliefs. In addition, this list is not exhaustive. This remark often happens in political scene, and politicians' reputation may be a difference between re-elections. Discussion of simple ad hommm exploitation: Daisy is hippie, it does not matter whether it should be recycled or not. It is an insulting paradox because she is disapproving of Daisy's claim because it is a hippie, that is, she is not what she said. The conclusion of these discussions is often implicitly or implicitly conveyed. Some of the arguments against this person are based on assassination of jealousy, jealousy, or personality. In this case, the premise is an error, it is irrelevant.

Advertisement abuse (also called personal or personal violence) usually involves insulting or insulting the person to invalidate the partner's assertion, but in fact de facto personality not related to the partner's assertion The above defects or actions are also included. This strategy is logically wrong. Even insults and true negative facts about the individual's role are not related to the logical merit of the partner's assertions or assertions.

The most famous of these is "Argument Advertisement" or simply advertisement home. Advertising personality is "Latin" in "Latin". This represents a trap of negotiations that denies controversy by attacking witness personality, motivation, and other attributes, not the essence of attack theory itself.

Insult: When attacks on irrelevant personal qualities such as attacks and appearance on characters appear as evidence against his position, advertisement abuse occurs. Such attacks are often effective interference ("Red squid"). Because we believe that it is necessary for the other party to protect ourselves, we are trying to divert the subject of discussion. Environment: Environmental advertisement in which unrelated personal circumstances surrounding the opposition party are provided as evidence against their position. "Of course this is what you are expecting to say to them." Public opinion argues that the only reason they do is because of personal circumstances such as profit from acceptance of arguments.