Absolutism vs Human Rights

Human rights evolve over time, civil rights and democracy are now the focus of the world debate. Together with the United Nations, it has become a global problem. Rights exist through the history of mankind. After the monarchy discussed the absolute power of the country, the concept of civil rights and democracy developed. This absolute power is called absoluteism. After the debate about the king's power, a revolution took place, causing democracy like America.

However, most human rights are not absolute. Some are stated as "with restrictions". In other words, it may be restricted under the specific circumstances specified in the relevant provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. For example, if a person is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, the rights of freedom are restricted. Other rights are expressed as "qualified". This means that you can restrict them only to protect the rights of others or for specific reasons (such as crime prevention) for public interest. For example, if a person encourages racial hatred, the government may limit the right to freedom of speech.

The right to protest is human rights caused by recognized human rights. Although there are no human rights documents or giving the absolute right to protest by the National Assembly, the right to this protest will be the realization of the right to assembly, the right to freedom of association, and the right to freedom of expression. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the US Constitution and many state constitutions and the first revision of state and federal law. Freedom of speech is not absolute, the US Supreme Court has acknowledged several statements that are excluded from freedom and the government can take reasonable time, place or method to limit speech He admitted.