What is wrong with the ivory tower? Peter's appointment ("The death of a disabled newborn baby!") The singer of Princeton University Bioethics School is considerably controversial. Recently, Steven Levitt, an economist at the University of Chicago and John Donohue III, a professor at Stanford University law school, were impressed with their research paper "Legal Abortion and Crime". Writers argue that legalized abortion contributed to the declining crime rate in the 1990s. They will implement a new subcategory of humanity - "a woman with the highest risk of child engaging in criminal activity" - possible felony.
Steven Levitt of Stanford Law School suggested that legalization of abortion could indirectly lead to a reduction in the crime rate since the 1970s (abortion). I know this sounds a bit over the wall, but if you read the reason, it will begin to sound logical (abortion). Abortion hampered the birth of many people born in poverty. Therefore, the possibility of committing a crime increases. I believe that all the women who think that child rearing can not be done and that there is no abortion has ended this last stage. Right to stop pregnancy. It is usually correct if women know that their children can not be raised economically. It is necessary to carry out abortion so that mothers and children do not have to experience poverty.
It is common knowledge to recognize whether abortion can reduce crime. Throughout the 20th century, eugenics promoted abortion and birth control, claiming that crime would decrease if fewer "lower class" children. This is one of the main themes of contraception commentary by Margaret Sanger, Montgomery Malford wrote as follows. Strong resonance with many people. The most famous research on the relationship between abortion and crime was done by John J. Donohue III and Steven D. Levitt in 2001. Harvard Economics Quarterly says, "Legal abortion has greatly contributed to the recent decline in crime, and abortion seems to account for 50% of the recent decline in crime rate"