A Study of Modern and Classical Fencing

For contemporary and classical fencing fencing is a way of personal expression and liberation. For some people, it is ultimately a way of life. But this noble lifestyle is dying. Some people will convince others that classic fencing is a way of the past. Instead, they advertise sports that use the same equipment, but they can not think of it in a different light, same light. The controversy between the two raises the question "Is Olympic Fencing better than the classical one?" Question which needs some research.

Fencing is a group of three related battle movements. Three areas of contemporary fence are metal foils, Epe and saber, victory points are achieved through contact with the opponent. The fourth subject, the single shot, appeared in the 1904 Olympic Games, but it was excluded afterwards. It is not part of modern fencing. Fencing was one of the first sports that took part in the Olympic Games. Based on the traditional sword technique, modern movement was born in the late nineteenth century, Italian schools modified many years European classical fence martial arts, and French school later later Italian system Has been improved. There are three forms of contemporary fences, each with different types of weapons and different rules, so sports itself can be divided into three competing scenarios: aluminum foil, Epe and saber. The most competitive fencing player simply chooses to specialize in certain kinds of weapons.

One field not explored when teaching these systems is pedagogy that is implicitly or explicitly supported by different fence texts. This article describes some of the early modern fence teaching methods and the challenges and problems associated with attempts to rebuild or modernize system education. Specifically, Italian, Spanish, and English text formats are compared with the classic fencing method and the various methods used by today's Western martial artists.

Modernization theory studies the process of social evolution and the development of society. Classical modernization theory focuses on micro assessment of modernization, focusing on elements of social modernization, experience trajectory and obvious process of state and society, economic and political modernization. But there are two major problems with classical modernization theory. One is determinism inherent in modern logic and the second is a specific development model that modernization theory must deal with. Contemporary modern theory is not a deterministic framework implied by classical modernization theory, but rather in a random framework, structural changes in high-level analysis and operation of equipment in low-level analysis We are linking.