A Review of 2001: a Space Odyssey

2001: Space roaming is like a long roaming journey of body and mind. Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clark worked very well. There is a difference in finding these two works, movies, and novels, but the theme is perfectly consistent with the whole concept. This is the achievement of the 1960s. The visual effect of 2004 is still attractive. Their achievements in 1968 must have been like this. Back then, I looked down on those who saw the movie. If I do not have a great prejudice, will I still receive it?

After looking at and recently seeing the stars, by reviewing the "Space Journey" (Space Travel) in 2001, the film has started all the alien films which seems very suitable. Interestingly, in our solar system and the universe, how special effects changed to "real" feeling over time. Although it was produced in 1968, this movie obviously goes beyond filming and its influence. Stanley Kubrick said that he does not relax, as we see follow-up of the 1960 movie "Sparticus" in this revolutionary SF movie. He will continue to produce shiny all metal jackets afterwards, and further A.I. artificial intelligence. Kubrick was one of the great producers of his generation and it was clear in space roaming in 2001. He began experimenting the evolution in the opening scene.

Film critic Roger Ebert reconsidered Stanley Kubrick's 2001 Space Odyssey in the spring of 1968. Critics can not understand everything he has seen right now: what are those mega-stones? What is the last row of this spooky hotel? Who or what is the "star's child"? Albert does not mind; you can see that he just saw a masterpiece. Still dumbfounded, but still dumbfounded, he expressed his state of confusion approaching the enantiomeric excess Cummings: "Listen - have a good place in hell for the next door; let's go"