A Reader-Response Criticism of How I Learned to Drive

How do I learn to drive Li'l Bit is a story of a teenage story. Li'l Bit, 17, will follow the life from the age of 11 to 17 and play the story of the narrator. This story shakes Li'l Bit through the story and develops around the man sexually expressed, Li'l Bit and Uncle Pecle. The story makes the story itself a story with stories and separation. Li'l Bit's life, even her explanation about events close to her is like a drama and her comments are full of humor, sarcasm, etc (she's a joke of a comedian like).

1 Look at the five characteristics of criticism of the reader's reaction (Porter 1990: 279); the general image used to describe the reader's reaction method is the suggested text as a mirror rather than the window (Cahill 1996: 89). And eliminate duplication, double, contradiction (Du Rand 2005: 52); Reader's answer critic can often express text to various people to do various things (Powell 2009: 54)

At the most basic level, readers respond to the criticism that the reader's response to literature is essential to interpret the meaning of the text. However, criticism of the reader's response can take a variety of approaches. Critics who develop reader reaction theory can also use psychoanalytic shots, feministic shots, even even structuralist shots. What these different lenses use in common with the reader's reaction method is that they are "... what is the text that can not be separated from that effect" (Tyson 154).

In many cases, the criticism of the reader 's reaction will develop mainly on the phenomenon "reacting to reading". The theory identifies the reader as an important and active agent responsible for communicating the true meaning of the text through interpretation. Modern school of thought advocates existing literary ideas. According to this, literature is like an entertainment, allowing readers to create their own expressions related to text. It violates new criticism and other theories of formalism and completely ignores the role of the reader in reproducing meaning. New critics believe that there is only meaning in structure, form, content, or in the text. There is no appeal to the intention or authority of the author, nor is it taken into consideration of the reader's psychology. This single element is not focused on orthodox new critics