A Quality, Efficient Bureaucracy

The government is not only responsible for maintaining the law and order, it also has the responsibility to ensure that most citizen's lives are observed (Mukoro, 2005: 31). The roles of civil servants and bureaucrats are essential for the functions of modern countries (Basu in Briggs, 2007: 144) and are also important institutions for daily government activities (Tjiptoherijanto, 2007: 37). To some extent, the state of society depends on the performance of public services (Philips in Briggs, 2007: 144).

Mintzberg (1981) confirmed two kinds of bureaucracy. They are standard professional bureaucrats. Standard bureaucracy is based on the effective performance of standardized daily work. The specialized bureaucracy system depends on effective execution of standardized but complicated tasks. Therefore, it requires a higher level of professional skills. The standard bureaucratic structure is based on functions, large technical staff, and many intermediate managers. In contrast, specialized bureaucrats have few intermediate managers.

Bureaucracy is deliberate, deliberately and inefficient. Effective institutions deny the key features of bureaucracy and may cause nepotism and fraud. Likewise, the block chain has a record of unchanged paper and proof of work. It can be used to replace a bureaucrat who opens the way to a more efficient system without compromising the proposal to protect the bureaucracy. In FSM, every arrangement, rule, or law is represented by a series of states. You can think of it as a flow chart. FSM describes all possible states and transitions between them. Labor contracts include some terms provided by their own FSM, such as wages, non-compete clauses, holidays, and so on. After signing such a contract, it will be "real time" and all FMS will be set to the initial state. Any action taken by one of the parties may cause a state change.

Weber's bureaucracy tends to provide a theoretical discussion, regardless of whether bureaucracy should be regarded as efficient to be positive, effective, or negative. In this case, bureaucracy theory is considered to be objective if it contains specific goals. Mr. Weber argues that the bureaucracy is a goal-oriented organization that uses efficiency and reasonable principles to achieve the goal. Corporate scopos theory analysis leads to the involvement of all relevant stakeholders in decision making. Weber's bureaucracy's aim is to ensure that all participants in the organization have various goals and objectives and to find the most effective way to achieve them.

A great criticism of bureaucratic thinking is that this concept reduces the flexibility and initiative efficiency of the organization, which means that the growth of bureaucracy affects the efficiency of the system. More importantly, growth can also reduce flexibility. On the contrary, the latter can oppose the essence of bureaucracy and improve the efficiency of the organization, whereby the strange nature becomes self - destructive. This is because bureaucracy is more serious than is necessary. Bureaucracy is a device or means to enable an organization to work more clearly, more satisfactorily and more effectively. However, the importance of bureaucracy is increasing, so efficiency may be violated. Thus, when a bureaucratic organization takes over its position from a managed device and functions as an organization's target, the efficiency of the entire system decreases.