A Pro-Gay Marriage Argument

In today's United States, the divorce rate is 50%. Due to the disorder and the impact of the economic decline, marriage is no longer a priority for some people. For others, I think that marriage is not thought of many people but ignoring the fact that they are essential, they think they have been decided to save what constitutes the pattern of marriage. Homosexual marriage opportunities have been controversial for years and continue today. Many critics in this trial argue that the waiver of the gay union's rights already separates fragile marriage structures (heads).

The problem of gay marriage was solved in various ways, discussions, opinions. From a broad perspective of these discussions, only two opposition claims are included: gay marriage supporters and opponents. The specific discussion of the opposite two aspects includes the impact on society and children, government welfare, specific marriage law and children's production. These special discussions are controversial and require detailed discussion.

Discussion of birthrate is the most common academic argument against gay marriage and causes many reactions from gay marriage advocates. Repetition of birth discussions between advocates and homosexual marriage partners follows a somewhat boring pattern. It writes like this: Parry (by supporters of same-sex marriage): Necessary for marriage Infertility so "marriage is for reproductive purposes," the premise is wrong, or at least incomplete. Infertile couples, old couples, couples can not get married. No one is opposed to their marriage, so no one should oppose same-sex marriage.

There are many religious claims and protests against gay marriage. Homosexuality is not a couple of nature Marriage, including that of sacred things and sacraments, the main purpose of marriage is to give maternity, marriage is defined as a bond between male and female. In opposition to gay marriage, many people point to the Bible verses. Most religious opponents of gay marriage cite the two verses of the Old Testament as evidence of their view. The first is Leviticus 20: 13. If a man and a man are together in a man and a woman, they will be disgusted. They have to be executed (Burns, 2002)

Defining a discussion was one of the most common responses to homosexual claims in the past. After the gay "Stone Wall riot" in New York City, the idea of ​​same-sex marriage, the first marriage, 9 two men and two women, several currencies to win the definition of argument It is a very strange idea to be the most direct expression through the collective surprise. When people listen to ideas they have never heard about, the best things they do frequently are the answers: frequently "of course" cultural, political, first Complete response is being considered. There is no need to explicitly protect the definition of marriage between men and women, as most people thought that just marriage partnerships were possible between men and women, before the contemporary gay rights movement.