A Practical Apocalypse

The purpose of this article is to explain the first Thessalonians 5: 1-11. In this exercise, we clarify the written intent of the author and show how the specific themes of these verses relate to the subject of the letter. Paul is the first author of Thessalonica, and there is almost no doubt. Green and Wanamekk agreed, "Wanamaker commented:" No modern scholar of modernity seems to doubt the character of Pauline of this letter. "Consistent with most academic views, the view of this article was written by Corinth when Corinth was written by Paul when it heard the report of Timothy about Tesaron, about 50-51 AD.

Ambrosia's comment on Paul shows a rich interpretation of works in the second half of the 4th century. Ambrosiaster did not write comments about the apocalypse (we know), he added his comments on Paul and his comments on the Old Testament and the New Testament to participate in the history of acceptance of the book I used it. This study put Ambrosiaster in other early Latin interpreters in John's Apocalypse (such as Victorinus and Ticonius) and studied how he used Apocalypse to clarify Paul's interpretation. His argument about Pauline's eschatology seamlessly integrates Revelation's idea with exact words. Regarding these issues, the voice of Paul is consistent with the voice of "apostle John." The voice of "The apostle John" is the author of Ambrosias' view of the apocalypse. Ambrosiaster tends to adjust the sounds of the two people as much as possible, because for him, the author of the two Bible does not think this is wonderful

People with worry: Revaluation of culture / Authorization of Hezekiah's prayer (2 Kings 37: 14 - 19 / Isaiah 37: 14 - 20)

After the Apocalypse / Apocalypse 1. Is it possible to imagine an Apocalypse that is not human-centered? To what extent do all visions of TEOTWAWKI (the last referee we know) focus bias and focus on human survival? How do we know that the end of the end of the human world will benefit the world? Artificial / life style after human 1. What does each job mean to human beings? For example, where are the boundaries of humans and humans, such as animals and machines, artificial intelligence, creation, alienation, cloning? What is the moral, philosophical and / or moral significance of tackling these problems? How are these issues related to figurative terms in the world we live in?

According to many critics, artificial intelligence eats the world, ruins all our work, destroys our brains and is trying to eradicate humans. Companies and writers are in a position to strengthen and play an important role. Most news on the work that will be affected by the rise in artificial intelligence assumes that the creative industry is least affected. Accountants, lawyers, urban traders, and those who analyze large amounts of data are in danger. Indeed, most visionary companies in these industries have adopted the AI ​​team to predict the transition to this new way of work. Fortunately, it is the most difficult to copy on a computer - the act of creation, the evaluation of creativity, and the action that we can broadly call "human", so the creative industry is the most It is on the front line.