A Personal Model of Leadership

INTRODUCTION Leaders can develop and understand his strengths and limits to grow and become a more effective leader through the identification and continuous evaluation of the style and ability of leadership. The purpose of this paper is to understand the current leadership patterns, to determine the author's leadership style, and to explore the importance of leadership to organizations, society, and authors, in servant leadership, contingency, and path-oriented style leadership It is to outline.

Most research and summaries on the characteristics of leadership are qualitative. The five-person personality model of leadership provides a quantitative assessment of the characteristics of leadership. It conceptually develops around the five-person character model. It explains the relationship between five major personality traits and leadership (Northouse, 2007, p. 22). Judge et al (2002) evaluated the relationship between the top 5 and leadership based on 78 leadership and personality studies announced between 1967 and 1998. They found a close relationship between the five qualities and leadership. Extroversion is the most strongly relevant factor in their research leadership and is therefore the most important characteristic of effective leaders. The second factor is responsibility and openness. Neurosis is actually the third factor closely related to leadership, but it is negatively related to leadership.

After considering the various leadership styles of this term, I feel that my personal leadership model fits best with James MacGregor Burns' innovative leadership model. Barnes' research focuses on ways that leaders can motivate and improve working conditions to improve performance. - Situational Leadership Theory Many leadership styles and theories have emerged as there are no special or precise type leaders. This is because the different types of leadership will be different. In many cases, leadership theory will help predict the optimal leadership style to apply to a particular situation. This paper attempts to explain why Situational Leadership Theory is useful and relevant for developing an effective leadership culture.

All the leadership models according to the situation emphasize the influence of external factors on a specific leadership style. Different leadership styles indicate styles determined by different context factors. In this model, we focus on situational factors and criteria for choosing a variety of approaches, task oriented and oriented oriented optimal style. Normative decision model identifies three leadership styles, dictatorship, negotiation, and participation. In each model, context factors that affect the effectiveness of leadership differ. The key reason is that the canonical decision model is equivalent to doing leadership and decision making and focusing on this leadership function only. These models also use different criteria to assess the efficiency of leadership