A Nation at Risk and No Child Left Behind: Deja Vu for Administrators

There was a report called "dangerous country" in 1983 before the "no children left behind" bill was enforced. This report contains information and statistics on how the academic performance meets the national and international scale. In response to this report, the National Education Council made 38 recommendations to the school. These recommendations fall into five categories. Contents, standards and expectations, time, teaching methods, leadership skills and economic support (a country in danger of not allowing children to delay them: DÉJÀ VU as a manager)

In 1983, the Reagan administration announced "dangerous country". In 2002, the Bush administration supported that "children should not be placed behind the bill." The Obama administration pushed the highest level of elections in 2010, and then re-established "Do not delay children" who re-approved the "Primary and Secondary Education Law" of 50 years old (2015). Approval). For the last 50 years (after most World War II) politicians have used funds as tools to shape American education - to weaken the way the United States competes with other countries. These educational politics promoted the story of school failures

It will be a matter of transition to the public sector and countries, provinces and rural areas. In 2002, President Bush signed the law "Do not drop a child behind the law" that obliges the school to oblige the school to educate the child to comply with legal standards and not to delay children did. So, who are we responsible for educating our children? teacher? What about these schools? parents? community? As a region, how do we make each system responsible for providing quality education for the next generation? Critics of this approach believe that it will pay too much attention to the test education of the school. As a result, the school may abandon or may no longer emphasize non-tested subjects such as art, music, foreign languages, creative writing. They also said that some municipalities' rights were sacrificed to the state and the central government.