A historical Overview by Bernard Lewis

For a long time there was compatibility between democracy and Islam, and there was considerable discussion and debate. After the birth of Muslims, as the population of Muslims expanded, this monotheist religion, Abraham's religion became the second largest religion in the world, and there were over 1 billion believers. Over time, many people began to believe that liberal democracy can exist in the Islamic world, as it has all the necessary elements needed by contemporary democracy and society.

What is wrong with his first book? Bernard Lewis has dominated today's Muslim world and studied the historic roots of outrage that is increasingly appearing in terrorist acts. Focusing on the theological origin of political Islam, he understood us the radical rise of Iraq in Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the radical Wahhabi mission to the other Islamic world and Saudi Arabia I led to study the effect of the petroleum fund. Starting with grasping the first sentence, this novel exemplifies the term "Kafkassk". That dark and humorous story conveys the story of bank employee's trap based on absurd absurd rules and maze of bureaucratic obstacles - based on undisclosed accusations. An attractive allegory of the state of Kafka 's human being, written in 1914 and published in 1925, plummeted isolated individuals into a non - personal non - logical system. The provocative nature of the nature of justice, and the problems associated with it.

Among the famous scholars who questioned their designation, Bernard Lewis, Stanford Show and Günter Ruy acknowledged historical events and their influences, but refused to accept the intent of the massacre And the "uniqueness" of the Holocaust was the truth. genocide. Justin McCarthy, Heath Lowry, and Eberhard Jäckel completely denied this claim and were criticized and accused by other scholars as promoting denial of the Armenian massacre. The term "genocide" was made by Polish Jewish Rafael Lemkin in 1943. Although he did not know the full scope of the Holocaust, he escaped the rule of the Nazis. He later used it to explain his view on the Armenian slaughter. In an interview with Cousy Cole in 1949, Lemkin explained as follows. It happened after Armenians, and then Armenian Hitler, took action. "

In November 1993, American historian Bernard Louis said in an interview that the genocide committed by the Turks in 1915 is "Armenian version of this history". In a civil lawsuit in 1995, the French court denounced his statement as denying Armenian genocide, imposed a fine of 1 franc upon him, ordered Rumonde to disclose the ruling at the expense of Lewis . The court held that the court had the right to express his opinion but harmed the third party and could prove that there is no "serious evidence" only by hiding the elements that violated that assertion "I decided. I express myself about such a subtle topic and failed to fulfill its objectivity and prudent duty "