A fifty year study of 160,000 children confirms why you should never spank your children

The meta-analysis found that the more children received disciplinary action, the more aggressive and anti-social they were.

This study, published in the Journal of Family Psychology, concluded that after more than 50 years of research on over 160,000 children, the poor behavior of spanking children has similar effects as physical abuse.

Our analysis focuses on what most Americans think they are spanking rather than the possibility of abuse.

Spanking was associated with the harmful consequences of the accident and it turned out to be irrelevant to more direct or long term compliance. This is the expected result of parents when training children.

As Dr. Andrew Grogan-Kaylor stated, these are known to have similar negative effects on physical abuse.

The result of this study is that spanking increases the likelihood of various adverse effects to children.

Over the world, 80% of children are beaten in this way - perhaps because such child abuse is likely to support this punishment.

However, according to our survey, spanking is related to the outcome of the same negative child as abuse, but not so much.

In the UK it is illegal for parents and carers to hit their children unless it is equivalent to "reasonable punishment". This takes into account many factors, including the age of the child. Article 58 of the 2004 Children's Act provides for such defense

Earlier this year, researchers at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Michigan conducted a comprehensive systematic review of spanking research over 50 years covering over 160,000 children. This is a much more complete analysis of how spanking affects children. For beginners, this paper defines spanking as "a blow on the back, arm or leg". In this review, it turned out that about 80% of the children were beaten as punishment or received some form of corporal punishment. In most cases reviews have found that spanking is not an effective way to punish children, it is as harmful as a more serious physical abuse such as a harmful effect - punching.

This study, published in the Journal of Family Psychology published this month, has investigated 50 years of research for more than 160,000 children. The researchers stated that this is a much more complete analysis of the results related to spanking, and more specifically more detailed than previous papers on the impact of spanking, including other types of corporal punishment in its analysis ing. Elizabeth Gershoff, Associate Professor of Human Development and Family Science at the University of Texas at Austin, says: "Our analysis focuses on potential abuse rather than the potential abuse most thought of by Americans." The harmful effects are related and more direct or long-term compliance It is irrelevant. This is the expected result of parents in training children. "

Time recently mentioned a newly published pediatric study that confirmed the results of many early studies. "As a 5-year-old child, spanking children are more likely to be provocative than non-punking children, and it is because of our work that we believe that we are most confident in dialogue and from parents It was found to be the formation of 13,000 customer lives of the first six years because spanking leads to the belief that I can not do anything about it, so the dysfunction described in the above study I am not good.I should be punished.Is a bit wrong.Safe way is to rule others.Violence is an acceptable way to deal with the difference.Penalty The way to keep it out is that it can not be caught.