A Feminist Reading of Paul's Case

Looking at the feminist interpretation of Paul's case, the interpretation of feministic "Paul incident" by Willa Cather may be considered difficult as many women are not mentioned in the text. However, there are good reasons for feminists to read the story only with this fact. The absence of women in this story supports the idea that women are not considered an important part of society in Willa Cather's life. In "Paul's case", the story develops mainly among young people.

Paul has more career as a work for women's rights leaders and feminists. As the title implies, this book is not a simple biography (it is partly due to the fact that the author recognizes the private nature of Paul and leads to a limited source), and also the history of Paul's movement is. This statement is very positive about the cooperation between Paul and the National Women's Party. However, reading carefully indicates that organizations are not acting enough to handle women colorfully, and the author plays an important role in the fight of women's rights such as Ida B. Wells and Pauli Murray There are some women. Subtle awareness of Paul's privileges as a white woman with economic instruments and relationships. This book is sold between the ages of 10 and 17, but please do not just publish for children. It is suitable for young readers, yet it offers attractive and informative reading material for people of all ages

The history of feminist refers to the reinterpretation and reinterpretation of history from the viewpoint of feminism. This is different from the history of feminism that outlined the origin and evolution of the feminist movement. It also differs from the history of women whose history is focused on the role of women in historical events. Rediscovering and clarifying women's historical perspective by rediscovering female writers, artists, philosophers, etc. to restore and demonstrate the importance of past women's voices and choices is a feminist history The goal is.

In the case of feminists reading female text, Scheickart must first be careful about important important strategies of women's text. Her argument is that text feminist reading written by a woman was caused by the requirement of connection to the restoration or background, if the feminist reading of the text written by the man was caused by a request to discontinue the regretless process The custom is to connect female writers. Female readers and critics, and readers as a whole