A Doll’s House and The Cherry Orchard

Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House and Anton Chekhov's "Cherry Garden" are known for expressing cultural changes. During the extensive liberation, both play served as a kind of social commentary and utilized these seeming stereotyped character distortions to talk about the whole group. Through two scripts, this is in contrast to the fact that different groups are often regarded as being destructive, often contrasting and at the same time impacting the audience.

Investigation of wealth as a determinant of freedom builds society and economy from the beginning in Dolls House and Cherry Garden, but wealth is regarded as a symbol of freedom as it provides countless possibilities. Both Dolls House and Cherry Orchard are introducing people who are in trouble because there is no wealth. Therefore careless observers will think that economic difficulties are the main obstacle for playwrights. Further research clearly shows that the lack of psychological freedom is the current dilemma.

Henrik Ibsen argues that he is "a poet rather than a social philosopher" and Anton Chekhov intends to turn "Cherry Garden" into a "light comedy", but "Doll House" and "Cherry The theme of social change in the garden, first, the struggle for self-liberation of women in the 19th century, and the latter is the desire and ultimate collapse of the Russian upper class family at the turn of the century.

In the drama "A Doll's House" and "The Cherry Orchard", both writers clearly emphasize the important deceptive behavior of the behavior of the character and the behavior of the drama. Fraud is a misleading act that brings betrayal and distrust among people as it violates morality as being right. Most people hope others are sincere and honest, but this is not always the case. People tend to lie and deceive or defend their thoughts, protect others, or protect others