A Discussion of Vivisection

Discussion on anatomy Many people believe that the anatomy is cruel and sickening, and totally unnecessary. Biological anatomy is a human experiment on living animals, which is not necessary. Less than 2% (1.16%) of human diseases are seen in animals. Animals die in the UK laboratory every 4 seconds. Do you really want this to happen without a reason? There is much debate as to whether it should be a band, but there are not enough people to oppose it, there is not enough time to solve this problem.

"A reasonable argument about this topic begins with asking if the pain is bad, otherwise the situation for the anatomy will decline, but the same can be said about the anatomy. If it is not bad, why should we reduce human suffering? Therefore, as a basis for the whole discussion, we must think that pain is evil Now if pain is evil, then Painful behavior that you consider to be yourself must obviously be an evil act ...

In 1655, physiologist Edmund Omeala was recorded as "torture of tragic biological anatomy that makes the body unnatural". Therefore, O'Meala expressed a major scientific objection to biological anatomy. One: The subject's pain will prevent the accuracy of the result. You asked me what I thought about biological anatomy. I fully agree that a true investigation of physiology is justified. But not only for damn and despicable curiosity. This is a horror theme to make me angry, so I will never say a word again, otherwise I will not sleep tonight. "

By the beginning of the nineteenth century, there was a debate as to whether animals could be felt, and to what extent the biopsy was valid based on the human benefit obtained from the animals. The second half of the nineteenth century was the beginning of scientific and medical animal experiments, but this time also reflected the popularity of biological anatomy in the UK. However, opposition to biological anatomy was established in the UK, but not in France or Germany. French doctor - physiologist François Magendie (1783-1855) was said to be the founder of modern physiology. He is widely recognized as contributing to science. Because he is the first person to decide that many body processes were created by the cooperation of several organs. This understanding began a number of experiments involving manipulation of procedures rather than internal observations.