Some people insist that there is not enough household waste to recycle. They said that the only way to increase recycling is to make it a legal requirement by the government.
I think this is a very interesting question, but it is a bit difficult to answer. The position I took was to agree with the legal requirements on recycling and to prove my position in two paragraphs. I already marked some words that are useful for this parameter and general parameters.
People are increasingly wasteful by the rising living standards all over the world. Although this is a potential environmental disaster, it can be mitigated by various steps including recycling. In some countries, the government already has recycling as a legal requirement, I sincerely support this position.
It is important for the government to recognize civil liberties, but it is clear that people are not responsible for wasteful action. For various reasons, efforts to encourage people to gently recycle have failed. There are many incentives that can be done, but these incentives do not guarantee people's cooperation, which is expensive for the government. However, severe punishment plays a proper deterrent role and will see a lot of people. Otherwise, in line with the government's position, they will ignore incentives and suggestions.
In addition, the future of our planet is very important and we can not let it into the hands of ordinary people. It is impossible for the public to reasonably expect that they are willing to spend their time and energy on recycling, as they have too much concern in their daily lives. It seems to be very demanding as a legal requirement, but it guarantees the future of everyone. Finally, for a small number of people, it is best not to have anyone suffer from disasters related to environmental deterioration, but to be punished.
After all, I think that it is reasonable for the government to enforce laws that force all citizens to recycle, but on the surface it seems like a tough measure.
Please carefully read and understand the evaluation criteria of the written task before reading the sample key response. You also need to read the following main sources of information. This is only one of the many pages mentioned in the student's work, but provides a reference frame when reading sample answers. It is often said that literature is the voice of oppressed people. Marjane Satrapi has certified this in her painting novel / remembrance Persepolis, where she excluded and eliminated children, secularists, even Muslims, during the Islamic Revolution of the 1980s did. Silence Her work is a voice of an oppressed person
A sample of the important answer (Issue 2) provided on this page was written after studying the drama "Pygmalion" by George Bernard Shaw in 1944. This work is very versatile and English A: very suitable for general language and literature courses. Culture, context, language problems, gender are important in understanding the text. Students will demonstrate understanding of these ideas with the following issue 2. The students answered the question: "If the text were written at different times or places, how and why for different spectators?" Students are still concerned with the information of Shaw in modern London We insisted there was. He thinks that if we make some modifications, we can put the text in the Canary Riverside Estate in London. There, migrant workers in Africa fulfill the role of Eliza de Little.
The first task of sampling is to accurately identify and define the sampling population. Whether the representation is representative or not, the sample is any part of the population. The most difficult task in choosing a sample is to define the population in an appropriate way. This ensures that the sample represents the population and that the result of the data is biased. Since it is often impossible to select the actual sample size to use generalization, the researcher must make sure that the representative sample is an extension of the whole sample.