A Critical Analysis of Plato's and Sartre's Views on Existence

An important analysis of the existence of Prato and Sartre Introduction In order to understand the meaning of the existence of philosophy, we need to discuss its normal meaning and various aspects of existence. The Chambers Concise Dictionary (1992, 362) defines that "existence" has a physical existence, to live, to live, to stay alive, and to define the existence as "the state of existence or existence" I will. In other words, "dictionary" does not distinguish between existence and life.

Many critics believe that the philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre is contradictory. Specifically, he insists that his philosophical view ignores metaphysics, but they believe that Sartre proposed metaphysical arguments. Herbert Marcuse criticized the existence and emptiness of Sartre in 1943 as projecting anxiety and meaninglessness on the essence of the existence itself. "As long as existentialism is a philosophical principle, it is still an idealistic principle: since certain historical conditions of existence are embodied in ontological and metaphysical features, existentialism is the ideology of that attack Its radicalism is fantastic.

The existence and the role of nihilism in our life is the quest that philosophers have been going from Plato and Aristotle from Sartre to us for centuries. We are trying hard to solve this problem, but we can not deny the observation of spaces, holes and gaps to provide a richer perspective. It is important to simply "observe this space".

Plato is a Greek philosopher with much opinion about life and existence. Since his time, Plato's view of the mind and body has been subject to many criticisms. In the Republic, he advocated ideas on cave fables and formal theories. We believe that our existence on the earth is only a shadow of a higher spiritual level. Our body is just a container like a cage covering the soul, it is this higher than this It is limited to plain. Because Plato is a binaryist, I believe that there is a soul when the body dies. He believes that we are double creatures; the soul is different from the body, and vice versa. The body has expansion (takes up space) and is not permanent: it will have a beginning and end. The soul does not occupy space, it is immortal. It is in our body and exists forever. Plato does not truly believe that the soul is not "alive" but part of the existence outside of time.

Plato has produced a lot of criticism about the contemporary analysis of the spiritual point of view; there is a clear time confusion as his work progresses; although the soul begins with an understandable intangible thing, a complex three It exists as. Place, this entity is trapped in materials, but still wants to enter the formal world. Plato showed a contradictory chaotic thought process and tried to find a way to solve the flaws in his thoughts. The idea that an incomplete entity falls into a complete form state is a logical mistake in his argument and he is to find the reason and reason for his conclusion rather than seeking a conclusion based on his own logic Do this for you.