A Comparative Study on the Philosophies of Plato and Aristotle

Plato and Aristotle are definitely the world's largest philosophers. Both Plato and Aristotle formed a unique and unique theory of the Greek city state. Most people think that Plato and Aristotle are opposite, but this is not completely true. For those studying the work of the two philosophers, Aristotle's theory is only the development of Plato's system. Because it abolishes the shortcomings of Plato's theory. However, it was pointed out that Aristotle never spends the day without criticizing Plato.

The purpose of this paper is to compare and compare the realistic views of Biarritz and Plato. Plato and Aristotle were among the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, and they were connected in the study. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle learned at Plato University. Plato was the first of the two to learn, and Aristotle studied there. And after learning this, people will think that both philosophers have the same belief and theory, but actually the opposite is true, but the theory of some people is theoretical to others Give your thoughts. Plato is a faithful believer in God, Aristotle follows the laws of science, thus creating all the dichotomies of the famous Plato and Aristotle.

Plato founded a philosophy school called the Academy in Athens. Here, Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) is the only competitor affected by Plato's young contemporary, Western philosophy and began his research. Aristotle often criticizes Plato severely, but his work is very different in style and content, but the time they spend together is reflected in a considerable number of commonalities. Therefore, Aristotle believes that Plato believes that good life is good, good for society, and informative. Aristotle also agreed that the highest and most satisfying form of human existence is that human beings use the utmost reasonable abilities. One big difference is that Aristotle does not accept Plato's theory of common or universal thought. This exists irrespective of a specific one. Therefore, he does not believe that the way to good is through the understanding of the universal form or concept of "good".