A Closer Look at Sociologist's Explanations for Women's Susseptibility to Poverty

Looking closely to the explanation of women's negative poverty by sociologists, we are surrounded by poverty. However, because there is no official poverty line in the UK, it is difficult to define poverty. We use 50 to 60% of the average income. Therefore, it is necessary to grow more or less.

There are several contributors and accounts on this seemingly contradictory relationship between poverty and obesity, and in particular evidence of relevant trends between the two descriptors between women and children. As part of these explanations, the habits and nutritional constraints imposed by poverty during pubertal seem to be a major factor. The socio-economic status, gender and ethnicity of a person is a reliable indicator of the likelihood or opportunity to predict the likelihood of becoming obese to others. The purpose of this report is to address and document the cause of the serious impact of poverty on the incidence of obesity among women and children: especially during childhood and adolescence.

Sociologists have discovered many explanations about the existence and sustenance of poverty. These include unemployment, homelessness, poor health, old age, lack of access to education, socio-economic status of poor areas, and so on. In this article we discuss two major sociological / political theories on poverty, one on the pathological interpretation and the other on what is called structural interpretation. As part of the pathology perspective, I will explore the understanding of poverty in individualism, family and subculture. Instead, we will study unequal ways of classes, institutions, and poverty in an organized account. By doing so, I will find solutions to their efforts to address poverty and to assess the relevance of moral interpretation and structural interpretation in the modern world (ibid).