A Change in Philosophical Thinking Presented in The Flies by Sartre

In flies, Sartre adjusted the myth of Electra that was used in the works of the ancient Greek tragedy author Ellipides, Ehilus and Sophocles. Unlike the ancient Greek tragedy writer, Sartre's play reveals some important changes in human life's thoughts and provides a philosophy to transcend human life. At Aeschylus' drama 'Europe', the dialogue with Athena, Orestes, Nemesis, Athens people reveals the ancient Greek human life and the view on how he should avoid life. Self-management of trouble and confusion

After a brief summary of Sartre 's life, this article examines the theme of Sartre' s early philosophy. Then it will analyze the ontology developed by Sartre 's main existentialist work "presence and absence". Finally, it outlines the further development of an existential theme with later works. Sartre was born in Paris in 1905. After his father died young, his grandfather played an important role, and after having a fairly unpleasant experience at school, Sartre graduated from the high school of Lisse Anrie IV in Paris. After preparing for two years, he entered the famous Ecole Normale Supérieure and was exposed to Raymond Aron, Simone de Beauvoir, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and other renowned figures from 1924 to 1929. For the second time, he tried to adapt the content and style of his sentences to the exceptional's fairly traditional demands and pass "Agrégation".

Simone de Beauvoir is the youngest student ever studied at the famous ÉcoleNormale Supérieure Academy. Then he became a star teacher and student, she is a famous writer, philosopher, feminist, life partner of Jean-Paul Sorter, an American writer who is famous for his anti-bourgeoisous lifestyle and her free sexual relationship Nelson Argren's enthusiasm. Regardless of whether there are independent philosophical works in the work of Beauvoir, or whether there is a re-enactment of Sartre's work, there are a lot of inks that have become controversial already. Of course, it depends on the fundamental misunderstanding that there is a part of the work, and there is a part of the work, and that it develops independently (or without being influenced) with that knowledge environment. This "objectivity" is not only impossible, it is not desirable either. Since such work can not be transferred, it will eventually become irrelevant.