A Century of Physics

At the end of the 19th century, after over 2000 years of ideological struggle by Greek philosophers, physicists had reasons to believe that they began to understand the universe. The theory of matter and energy, electricity and magnetism, heat, sound and light are proved in laboratories around the world, its accuracy is increasing more and more. The experiment is a powerful coherent knowledge system called methodology and mathematics, classical physics.

The 21st century is expected to be a physics-led transition from the century of biology, the last century. It is therefore considered appropriate to start this century by aligning the universe from the outside and combining the foundation of science with the simple concepts discovered by contemporary leading life scientists. Biocentricism has brought new possibilities among readers, filled with many shocking new ideas, and readers never see the reality in the same way. In 1972, a young philosopher Peter Singer published "famine, prosperity and morality" and quickly became one of the most widely discussed papers in applied ethics. Throughout this article, Singer expressed his view that we have the same moral obligation as those far from us. He thinks that choosing not to send money to save the lives to the hungry people on the other side of the earth is morally equivalent to ignoring drowning children because they do not want to drown.

There are many moral differences between the value of the 21st century and the value of the 17th century. In the 17th century, people were separated further in terms of body, religion and even morality. The same can be said for the United States in the 21st century, even though it was separated by religion and opinion, today's America is still the whole. One example was Obama 's speech, "I'm keeping Americans safe" (Attic). When he said that he will preserve the safety of American people, he will not discriminate against any religion or group, nor will stand with other people. This is a property not found in the culture of Puritan, whether it is due to religion or power, always divides in some way.