Establishment vs. Proletariat

In 1953, the CIA's coup in Iran represented hegemony of Iran's Western countries. The policies enacted by the West, especially the United Kingdom and the United States, have led to differences as to whether these particular countries should consider the role of isolationism or consider the role of guilt. To understand the histology of this problem, it is best to understand the positions of orthodox and non-orthodox scholars. Kinzer and Abrahamain are human representatives of discussions on the interpretation of orthodox and unorthodox interpretation of the Iranian incident. "... ... this defendant ... adopted a declaration defending the destruction of the country and the establishment of a dictatorship of proletariat ... ... advocate ... to carry out this plot through massive strikes or actions, the government has problems, the state Justice management, community health, morality and welfare are threatened to achieve the revolution or to claim the use of illegal means to overthrow the organized government. Proletariat will overthrow bourgeoisie and stand up to establish the proletarian government. Many criticisms have been made on the social stratification of Marxism. First of all, it's too simple. It impairs the importance of trivial bourgeoisie. It has also been criticized as too deterministic, emphasizing economics too much and sacrificing its position. Although Karl Marx's social stratification theory is entirely based on economic standards, Max Weber extends it by identifying three basic elements that lead to social stratification, wealth, power, and reputation To do. Weber believes that society has four major classes, upper class, middle class, white color class and working class or lower class. Historically, proletariat is also unique. In the past, when the class was predominant, it attempted to make society whole own own form. However, proletariat does not have its own assets to hold or to expand. Instead, they must destroy all methods to protect their private property. Another unique characteristic of proletariat is that past movements began with ethnic minorities, but that proletariat dominates and acts for the majority of the benefits.