Keats Was Wrong
[2023-03-07 23:41:18]
If memories (actually Google) serve me correctly, it is Keats with his "Greek:":
But if you want to know what is interesting, Keats is wrong. Of course, he is already dead - Wikipedia confirmed this. If he were still alive today, what would he say? Okay, I will tell you: he will not attack poetry about truth and beauty. He will shout as he avoids his coffin.
Well, in my little joke, there is no beauty, truth, and 100% fancy. Unless it laughed at it, funny had nothing to do with beauty.
Humor usually does not include ideals like beauty, but it does not correspond to the ideal of "Humor comedy" of the 16th century. "Humor" is a kind of "prejudice of the heart" that distorts a personality into comics we laugh. Yes, and with a piece of salt, of course
However, there are often more than a bunch of truth. Pat Oliphant draws humor here - starting with the fact, it then becomes more "true":
It differs from jokes or cartoon fantasies where dogs enter the bar or pigs can fly
This difference started in the 17th century and was in the past. The joke of the day used the words "humor" and "tact" to analyze the absurd crowd and divide them into different opposite groups. In the nineteenth century, the outstanding, less well-known Victorian people were busy to distinguish between them and stood unilaterally. "Humor," Growth of nature and accident, Tact is a product of art and fantasy "," Tact is more artificial, cultural, humor is close to nature "," Tact is a busy person with thought "outcome; it is a cafe, a salon , And literary clubs are the result of abundant knowledge development, humor is a gift to those who care about people rather than ideas. "
Even if I know how to use a semicolon, I will continue to use it, but "simple is the spirit of wisdom" (or humor?), I will not. "Humor" is a generic term for all things including wit. However, the heritage still exists in the Library of Congress, where all humorous books are actually submitted in the form of American wit and humor; there are also "New Yorkers" cartoons, some of which are characters It is based on.
No support is needed for this discussion. The truth is that we are humorous and witty. This is wonderful. If he is alive today, even Keats will agree - if he leaves the coffin
During the next few generations it is proved that Keats are afraid of persecution and terrible death to eternity. Even in 1820 and 1821, there were some positive notices such as approval of Francis Jeffrey who has a big influence. His friends, especially Hunter and Brown continue to publish memoirs, collecting materials, and only a small part of the public is familiar with the work of this youngster, but they are highly imaginative and subtle imaginations It is full of points. . In 1828, Hunt wrote the beginning of his biography sketch to Sir Lord Byron and some of his contemporaries. The most complete work of Keys' poetry "Kelly's poetry works", "Shelley" and "Keats" (1829), published in Paris and Philadelphia, includes a long memoir from Hunter.
John Keats is condemned for reasons such as bad words, young, inexperienced, politically wrong ideals, but through his work Keats is only for modern writers Hunter and Shelley I understand. I am seeking freedom or freedom. . In fact, this is the passionate and free country that Keats is aiming for.
Keats' eyes depend heavily on the beauty of sorrow and pleasure. The moral presence and the beauty seen in the spirit. As Shelley has told him, Keats always aims the best and in his short life it is impossible to doubt that he has reached a higher height than what most of us want . As he wrote in Endymion, Keats never lies about his own words: