3 - Equality for Animals?

In the previous chapter, I mentioned the basic principle of believing in equality, that is, the basic principle of human equality and the principle of thinking profit equally. Only this basic moral principle makes it possible for us to keep an equivalent form that encompasses almost all humans, even if there is a difference between them. (Exceptions are not conscious of humans, nor consciousness, so interest is not considered - topics discussed in chapter 6 and chapter 6). . When we accept the principle of human equality, we also promise to accept extending it to non-human animals.

When I wrote the first edition of this book in 1979, I warned the reader that the advice I made here may seem odd. At that time, discrimination against ethnic minority members and women was widely believed to be the most important moral and political problems. However, questions about animal welfare are widely considered to have no practical meaning, except for people who are absorbed in dogs and cats. It is widely believed that questions about humans should always be given priority over animal problems.

 - George Orwell, this sentence is written in a novel, shows abuse of "7 scorpions" and shows that it is equal rather than other animals. "There is no inequality among all animals, equality among all animals, but let's believe that some" more equal "pigs can trick other animals and pursue each animal's dream of freedom It seems to be. Propaganda is not all convincing power to control and attract people's judgments and emotions and make them do what they want. It is all propaganda, not all advertisements are bad (Stults)

When I wrote animal equality, my friend asked the title of the book. Do I really want to say that all animals are equal? Yes, I did. Love does not mean equal ability. This means that all animals have the same moral consideration and legal protection right. And "all animals" means all living beings, all living things that can be felt. Every organism with nervous system is wise, it is reasonable and correct. Reasonable reason is the common ancestry of all nervous systems and physiological similarity. Living creatures with nervous systems are as logical as they feel, which makes sense. Yes, we should question doubts about ethical considerations. Everyone who can feel the necessity of protection has the right to get all rights to those who can feel it. The only criterion of rights should be perception