2001 USA Patriot Act is Unconstitutional and Ineffective

I. Introduction After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the US Congress was passed in 2001 through a process called the "US Patriot Act" and "the appropriate tool necessary to prevent interception and terrorism" "Unified and strengthened adoption of US law." In this white paper, it is unconstitutional only that it is not the "US Patriot Act", but also many of the terms are used to protect Americans from the danger of terrorism I will try to prove that I am not doing it. The bill further increased the investigative power of supervisors and law enforcement agencies to protect the United States from terrorism, but the law of the US patriarch reduced the privatization and the law was amended,

The US Patriot Act is a bill by President George W. Bush in 2001 who signed on October 26. With the expansion of the 10th letter abbreviation (USA PATRIOT), the bill states that the abbreviation "United States unity and the strengthening necessary for the tool to intercept terrorist acts when intercepted by the United States of America 2001" Thanks for the full title Chris Cylke, the staff of the former House Legislative Committee. Congress passed a bill to strengthen rapid security control in response to 9/11 attacks and the case of B. anthracis. On October 23, 2001, Republican lawmaker Jim Sensen Brenner introduced HR 3162, sponsored by the former house, the second day bill and the Senate bill by the beginning of this month, by the House of Representatives voted 357 - 66 at the House of Representatives The bill, the Democratic Party holds a majority of dissidents

In September 11, the terrorist attacks of 2001 will be made within less than a week after the attack time, as proposed by the legislation. On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed the law with the final bill "American Patriot Act". While the bill on 15 important parts of legislation has been changed important, it is not rushing while proposing introduction of discussion almost through the house and Senate conference report. Therefore, there is no legal background history, often providing the necessary legal interpretation retrospectively.