1984 compared to cults

In the 1984 book by George Orwell there is a depiction group similar to what society calls cult. Cults are defined as religious or religious sects that are generally considered extremist or false, and their followers are usually colored by type under the direction of authoritarian, charismatic leaders I live by no way. Moralism is explained as a complete and unlimited power principle in the government. Topics in this book include language control, psychological and physical intimidation and manipulation.

It is not easy to define cults. The definition of Merriam-Webster's cult, "formal religious worship" is ambiguous and useless. Today, the term "cult" is in a public dictionary as a way to describe the group's experience designed to influence individual thinking and turn it towards group norms. There are few cult members who admit or admit that their group is a cult and there is a tendency for each of us to see "normal condition" in a different way, so for others, It is not surprising to live together or live in the middle of the forest; this is a conscious and modest rejection of social customs.

I separated the definitions of the cult and compare them with the previous transgender, but that is not superimposed. In short, in fact, not all of us have the overall ideology about trans sex. The truth is that if they do not pull the cult party, we can not rule out people and we do not encourage them to be separated from their families and society. Everything means no. There is no reason to call us a cult. But how about radical radical feminism? Calling it a cult is not easy. It is actually a fairly unique ideology to reject and abandon people who do not have quite strong singular ideas. The only feature of its disappearance is that it is completely out of society and justice ... Oh, etc. They certainly did political lesbians in the 1980s. Some people even leave their children, now they want to behave like their children, when they are not, they are taken away