1984: The Control Of Reality For Control Of The Masses

1984: Management of realistic control of the public 3 Key point: The party controls the conditions of human psychology by controlling the historical party. How the party dominates the reality: the way the party dominates the history. How does it affect current? How does deficiency affect human psychology What role does Big Brother play? Summary: Introduction: Country theme: The party dominates reality in order that it dominates history, psychology and people who rule God. Paragraph 1: History: Explaining the process of revisionism How it affects the current second paragraph: Psychology: Human rarity: Maslow's theory of human behavior that affects human behavior Paragraph 3 : God: Big

The belief in social activities in 1984 was that the control of human thought was the reality of control. O'Brien, an important member of O'Brien's government, said, "Reality is not external, reality is in human thought, not in other places.In minds of individuals who can make mistakes In the minds of the party this is collective and immortal, whether the party believes the truth is the truth, it is impossible to see the reality outside the party's eyes. "(205 ). The party does not care about objective facts. They believe that reality can only become a reality only when the reality is believed; furthermore, the reality of faith is the only reality. When O'Brien told Winston 2 that 2 is equal to 5, Winston has to trust it because it does not allow other choices. The party widened the idea, pointed out "those who rule the past to rule the future, those who rule the past are those who rule the present" (204).

In 1984, the party members practice mental distortion to dominate the reality, and simultaneously have two contradictory assumptions. This approach is called "double way of thinking" and does not give the impression of infringing reality. "One who dominates the past to rule the future, one who dominates the present that rules the past" Politicians often use double thinking when thinking carefully when lying. For example, at the Senate Hearing in March last year, I asked James Clapp of the National Intelligence Agency whether the National Security Agency collected information from millions of Americans. "No" Clapper replied. "I have no meaning." After the National Security Agency leaked the secret, Crap insisted he was not lying, but answered "in the most inaccurate manner". According to the Gospel of Wikipedia, we are used to the variable "truth".