14th Amendment -EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW

In an equal protection school under law, especially in our daily life, we will learn to defend freedom and equality of all people in the United States. We do not allow race, class, faith to determine the status of people in the community. This seems to be a social standard, but since the beginning of the written history these concepts of equality have been discussed, and prejudice still exists in the US today. In order to solve these and similar problems, the founders of the country developed a constitution that includes laws that govern individual freedom.

The 14th revision, which provides equal protection under the law, is interpreted as meaning that people in similar circumstances must be treated equal. "We can not enact or enforce laws that harm US citizens' privileges and we can not deprive anyone within the jurisdiction of equal protection of the law." It was passed in 1868 and Reed v. Reid This case was first applied as a women's group by the Supreme Court. Sally Reed had custody in Richard in the early days, but then Cecil kept Richard in youth contrary to the hope of Sally Reed. Both Sally Reed and Cecil Reid sued Richard property managers with a value of less than $ 1,000. The will test proceedings court appointed Cecil as administrator under Article 15 to 314 of the Idaho Act and said that "men must give priority over women," the court ruled that parents' abilities It does not consider it.

As you know, in the 14th amendment, "It is clear that every country can not deprive legal protection". In other words, all law passed by 50 states applies to everyone. Positive behavior gives racial preferences in hiring areas, registration and other competitive areas to some Americans. If an American gains preference, that person will not be treated equal to others. This is very easy. In 2006, 58% of Michigan voters won racial preferences at state universities and universities. After all, it was appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled that the people of Michigan had a constitutional right to say no to refusal. So, should an equal protection clause open a special place for special Americans? The problem is to hurt other people by giving one person preference based on skin color or race. Michigan University accepts so many students only. This is a little easy