10 CFR 1047.7 - Use of deadly force.

(A) Lethality is the ability to believe that a reasonable person may die or be seriously injured. It can only be used when all smaller means fail or can not reasonably be used under extreme conditions. A protective officer has the right to use fatal power only if one or more of the following conditions exist:

(1) Self-defense. It seems reasonable to think that deadly power is necessary to protect the officers who reasonably believe they are about to face death and serious physical injury.

(2) A serious crime against himself / herself. In case of imminent death or serious injury (such as destruction of explosives by residential facilities), if there is a reasonable lethal force to prevent serious violations, it is necessary to exercise a deadly force there is.

(3) Nuclear weapons or nuclear explosives. When it seems reasonable to use deadly power to prevent the theft, destruction, or unauthorized management of nuclear weapons or nuclear explosives

(4) Special nuclear material. It is necessary to use fatal force to prevent theft, destruction, or unauthorized management from a fixed nuclear material fixed place, or it is known that there is a quantity of cargo of class II or higher , Or it seems reasonably believed.

(5) In the distance. (I) committing part of illegal acts of the nature stated in paragraphs (a) (1) to (a) (4) 1 of this Article. Or (ii) to exit with a weapon or explosive, or to otherwise cause serious mortality or serious physical injury to a protective force or other person, unless arrested.

1 The Ministry of Energy considers these crimes as a serious death or serious physical harm

(B) Other considerations regarding firearms. If you need to use a gun, observe the following precautions.

Fitness: Employees must use SPE, carry out basic duties (as defined in 29 CFR 1630.2 (n)), have deadly power to enforce law enforcement and / or safety responsibilities Decide whether to use or not. Appropriate duties will be determined after medical examination and / or psychiatric examination or psychological assessment, according to the Human Resources Department standards or guidelines (where applicable). The Medical Services Authority (MED) has the capability of employees to perform basic duties and the ability to decide whether to use fatal forces to enforce law enforcement agencies and / or safety responsibilities We will provide individual assessments that we considered.

Before testing the moral and ethical evidence of a fatal force using a result-based paradigm, let's first consider an important aspect of the deadly power and its use by British police. Firstly, the fatal force defined by Geller and Scott (23) contains the power reasonably possible to cause death or cause physical harm. According to this definition, actions that can be killed should be consumed before it is considered a deadly force, and threats are not considered parameters of this range. According to Kappeler, Kraska and Marron (3) is an emergency situation such as takeover hostage, random shooting, tracking of unidentified criminals.

One of the most frequently debated police practices in the past 20 years was the use of fatal forces by law enforcement officials. The release of firearms, which can cause fatal forces, especially deaths of officials other than police, or that could lead to death, is a rather controversial issue and is built around several important aspects I will. First, as a society, we will give the police the power to use deadly power. This power distinguishes the police from any other agencies and organizations (Walker, 1983, p. 61). Police officers can serve themselves as judges, jurors and executors. But even with such a power grant, it represents a very important decision that a fatal force executive will question its suitability and in some cases its application will be taken into account. It is irrational. 1