1.07 Argument

The compass and the straight edge have existed thousands of years ago. They are valuable tools for students to apply in mathematics and the real world. These tools are easy to carry and are easy to use immediately. That's why students need to be able to understand and build geometry with compass and straight edges.

A compass and a straight edge have been used for more than 2000 years to create accurate geometry

Students using compass and straight edges have been proven to improve mathematics and maintain what they have learned.

Students do not need to use compasses or rulers. All shapes must be created using a drawing program.

More effort to achieve the same effect as a powerful tool, compass or straight edge has some drawbacks

Students need to be able to comprehend and build geometry using compass and straight edges.

Response to intervention (d = 1.07). This is a systematic program designed to help dangerous students achieve adequate progress, ideally to achieve results comparable to colleagues. There are many commercial literature and materials that schools can help utilize RTI, but basically it is to screen students to see those at risk. Select intervention settings, monitor progress carefully, and adjust strategies used when progress is not sufficient. The program is designed for students at risk, but the principles behind it are the same as those advocated by John Hutti and apply to all students. Note - Responses to interventions (RTI) are increasingly referred to as multilevel support systems (MTSS). These two words have the same meaning

Are there any differences? of course. Let's consider this example. I would like to pay with a coin, but you think it is a fake. When a fair coin is thrown 10 times, the possibility of it appearing at least nine times is very small (1.07%). If this happens with a random coin, it seems to be wrong, so it can be used as a test. But, if my debt is 100 coins and you think the wallet has counterfeit coins, will the single coin method apply to the entire baggage? The probability that fair coins appear less than 9 times is close to 99% (100% - 1.07%). The likelihood of two fair coins appearing less than nine times is slightly lower: 98.93% x 98.93% = 97.86%. In the case of three coins, it is still a little small (96.81%), so it lasts up to 100 coins, less than 34%

A general argument is that the marginal cost of handling unnecessary application coins inevitably leads to separation of application coins. At a deeper level, this is an objection to the redundancy of parallel implementation of a single type of Smart Contract. Parallel redundancy may exist even without application coins, parallel smart contract only affects ETH and requires "opt-in" to end users in other ways. Standardization of shared protocols eliminates parallel redundancy