In his discussion of parental permission, LaFollette proposed criteria used for licensing any of the above activities. "Activities that are potentially harmful to others and need to regulate certain certified safety functions" (LaFollette 522). Because parenting may harm others, LaFollette 's licensing criteria are met. Therefore, those who do not allow parents to make legitimate statements refuse the idea that other activities (such as driving) should also receive specific licensing procedures (LaFollette)
The claim that Hugh LaFollette's state should allow parents may be the philosophical version of support for parents' permissions, which is most influential and widely discussed (LaFollette 1980). LaFollette demonstrates this capability through (iii) reliable testing, and (i) it demonstrates that some activity is potentially harmful to others, (ii) requires some ability, We assert that we are eligible. These standards demonstrate the current license program. For example, because medical accidents can cause harm, doctors are asked to acquire medical licenses from the state and secure their abilities. Because an incompetent driver may harm others, in order to drive a car, you have to prove some skill. These standards also apply to child rearing. These tests are just beginning to be developed when his thesis was published.