1. In what ways are Weber's and Fayol's ideas about bureaucracy and administration similar? In what ways do they differ?

What is the similarity between Weber and Fayor concerning bureaucracy and administration? How are they different?

2. Which principles of Weber and Fayol do you think are most relevant to the creation of an ethical organization?

3. Why is Marry Parker Follett's work obsolete? What level do you think is appropriate for today?

What is division theory? Do you know well which organization succeeded in dealing with the emergency situation of the external environment or failed?

Weber's bureaucracy theory and Fejol's management philosophy explain how to create a better organizational structure. Both theories explain the relationship between workers and the elderly. The roles and responsibilities of each role and level are explained by the theory of Weber and Fayol. Both of these theories are universal and apply to the construction of the organization. Fayol's principle is more appropriate (George, 2004) as we can create an ethical organization, as they can be interpreted as people's roles and rights related to the organization.

Weber established a formal organization and management system designed to ensure bureaucracy - efficiency and effectiveness. This is a system based on five principles. Fayol identified 14 principles that we believe are essential for improving the efficiency of the management process. (1) Authority: This is the power to make people take responsibility for their actions and to make decisions about the use of organizational resources. According to Weber, the formal authority comes from the position of the administrator within the organization. Fayol is beyond formal authority, including informal authority derived from personal expertise, technical knowledge, ethical values, and the ability to create and generate subordinate promises.

Modern management (6th edition) edition version Chapter 2 Problem of solution 3MA problem 3MA: What is the similarity between Weber and Fejol with respect to bureaucracy and administration? How are they different?

The classical organization theory (Taylor, 1947; Weber, 1947; Fayol, 1949) addresses formal organizations and concepts that improve management efficiency. Taylor advocated the concept of scientific management, Weber gave a bureaucratic approach, and Fayol developed the management theory of the organization. They all make an important contribution to the development of classical organization theory. The scientific management approach developed by Taylor is based on the concept of a work plan to achieve efficiency, standardization, specialization and simplification. Recognizing that the way to improve productivity is due to mutual trust between management and workers, Mr. Taylor said that in order to raise this confidence level,