The purpose of the public university is to train the right number of people. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to set the number of students in each academic field beforehand like the Swedish. This will make it impossible to receive the training of more people, not the number of people who need training. Number of talent. In order to achieve this, the number of students in each field should be preset like Sweden. Doing so will not satisfy the estimated starting number of each occupation, and no more people will be trained. What does this mean?
CanProf is correct. This is an argument that the number of graduates should be limited to the number of available work.
To Aida: I fully agree with your second point; especially in case of multi-year course, in case of economic change, forecast how many graduates will be needed in a given year It is difficult to do. In other words, similar problems are occurring in systems similar to those currently existing in North America.
Also, I can not agree with your competitors. It really does not reduce competition. Instead, it transfers competition to the entry stage of the academic program, so only stronger candidates can enter the program first. This is very useful for the students involved and society as a whole. It is possible to participate in other highly productive economic activities than having many students spend a lot of money and receiving training that can not be used for a long time.
According to Phyllis Stein, "The number of students in each field of a public university needs to be set so that no more personnel or trained personnel are required to satisfy the scheduled vacant number of each occupation ". Stein's remarks are inconsistent, irrational and inhuman. I do not agree with this statement. Phyllis Stein said that it is necessary to register a certain number of students to match the estimated starting number for each occupation. How do you fit a preset number of students into the task of estimation? This is totally illogical and meaningless. For example, suppose you register 100 students in an engineer's program. At the beginning of the grade, 100 engineers are scheduled to open at the time of graduation.
According to Phyllis Stein, a public university is used as a tool to train people to prepare or need experts rather than a place where students can spend more time discovering this You should. Her view is valid, but that is not necessarily the case. For example, some schools offer vocational training to people. Students should also have more freedom to decide what kind of person they want to be. Finally, this idea may face more problems in other countries.