“The New Science Behind Your Spending Addiction”

In the article by Begley and Chatzky, the point about neurology is that there is a big difference between rescuing the human brain and not having tomorrow. Different areas of the brain can treat rewards, stimulate motivation, and predict the results that can control money. Economist William Dickens said in this article, "Happiness is worth more than later happiness for us now." That's why people can spend more money instead of savings and have more fun.

2. When the people's brain begins to consider consumption and shifting all these new things to save mode, the "brains of money" is called experimental results. The important point is to see if you can teach you to incorporate your brain into a better savings model, not expenditure.

3. The famous marshmallow experiment is consistent with the latest discovery. The experiment was tested to see if the children got another marshmallow's reward after waiting for a while and he did not eat it but a child waiting for the second marshmallow later than SAT at a later time I got a higher score. According to Child Mischel, this also supports the view on other aspects of "emotional intelligence" related to impulsive management and academic ability. He also found that children waiting are less likely to become obese, become illegal drug addicts, and are less likely to divorce. Observing people's habits from childhood to adulthood helps to strengthen the brain area and ultimately to learn how to prevent future instant satisfaction.

Neural plasticity is an important concept in the main ideas of Begley and Chatzky. Things will not change, things will never get better, it is very important for their main point of view. If we know that the brain can improve, why not start learning how to train the brain? Mr. Zach of Claymont said, "Conversely, even children can train their brains to recognize that relaxing will bring greater benefits." If we teach children to train their brains now, they can now learn to save money so that they will become more prosperous.

5. Scientists have not yet determined the differences between generations of brain functions because their claims have not been confirmed and they indicate that they are not trying to hide information. They are progressing towards approaching what to do yet. It will work in their discussion even though they still have the means to continue to determine the differences between generations of brain function

Latest news is that all these studies whether scientists love you by really scanning your brain or living in your voluntary cortex, by publishing brain science once a week It can be judged. Up brain scanner based on poor software. The possibility is great, but it is not so! One morning, when I heard about the news when I was about to work on NPR, it really laughed me, lapped the handle, and danced a bit at the driver 's seat.

NIDA published the first simple booklet to explain the science behind addiction. Drugs, Brain and Behavior - Addiction Science is used to understand why people take medication, why some people are addicted but not addictive, how drugs work in the brain, and addiction We will discuss ways to prevent and treat. Please look at the picture. In collaboration with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Alcohol Abuse Alcohol Addiction Research Institute (NIAAA), and HBO, NIDA has created the documentary 'poisoning' that won the Emmy Award. It explores many elements of drug and alcohol intoxication through the eyes. I am an addict and have insights from scientific experts who are dedicated to better understanding and treating this devastating illness

Impulse impulse control often involves drug and alcohol intoxication. The science of drug addiction explains that drug addiction is the reason for reducing impulse control and enhances the desire of drug addicts to take more drugs. This decline in self-control will occur not only for drug addicts but also for general users and new users. In the 1996 study "Improving substance use: adolescent to middle-aged long-term grouping analysis", young people who tested drugs or frequently used in recreational environments have lower self-management levels than colleagues It is highly likely. There are no test drugs or alcohol