“The literal truth”

Fran O'Sullivan continues ongoing philosophical projects to investigate the concept of truth in the recently repeated Herald column of Kiwiblog. Among them, she accepted an interview with Owen Glenn and weaved stories about conspiracy and mystery from several different facts. On the contrary, let us deepen the strange life of her mind.

I am not going to dispute this strange novel little by little. After reading carefully, it turned out that there was little content to refute. The real money is in rhetoric. This is one of my favorites:

Do you understand? "It is literally true." Obviously, the literal truth is not enough. This is when we see the metaphor of the truth, then fran? And after Glenn borrowed and referred to money for financing (money repaid in full), this is exactly what she will do:

According to Owen Glenn 's disclosure, surprisingly, the amount of refund of taxpayer's safe by the $ 800,000 Labor Party proved to be a result of a similar loan. The public has the right to know

Now you will realize that Fran does not present evidence of her complaint, but then the masses decided to have the right to know. It is a noisy commentator that we have previously written in his blog, but since The Standard is a "G" rating blog, I do not even link to it. But I will say this:

In the lack of facts in this column and in O'Sullivan's recent "Ground Option" article, her "report" is actually actually completed with the influence of hallucinogens. Reading the mass has the right to know

So how do you understand how the frank rhetoric works? You might think that because everyone else does this. I can think that "people should get better answers" only if "Herald" is the title of your column, they refer to your comment standards.

"We know that you have to pursue the necessary truth, and these veterans are willing to give up literal truth to achieve our purpose. But do not let us question the motivation of your movie management - otherwise we will not believe your basic truth at all.We are looking forward to the audience for this tacit movie There is a problem in violation, it is not even the contents of the screen, it is a problem hidden behind the screen: a man looking into the curtain, but keep away the damn man away from the gaze - not let him think about his plot Please do!

Do you understand? "It is literally true." Obviously, the literal truth is not enough. This is when we see the metaphor of the truth, then fran? And after mentioning the fact that Glenn is financing (fully repayed money), this is exactly what she is supposed to do: now you know that Fran is the proof You will notice that you did not submit it. The accusation against her decided later that the public has the right to know. It is a noisy commentator that we have previously written in his blog, but since The Standard is a "G" rating blog, I do not even link to it. But I will say this:

... The imagination norm does not mean that you need to consider only the truth of facts. It is part of the reason that people can always know through training of reasonable ability and can often take account of responsibility and living environment. However, when reason is strongly raised, imagination can safely follow its own purpose and make life a happy and beautiful one. With these principles, in my opinion, indulgence is hope for the universe government and destiny. After death, we are aware of the clear fact that there is no reason just for hope, but it can be legitimate and philosophically protected. This desired beneficial effect is not trivial. (Milling Room 1874, 248 - 9 years)