`The Battle of Westminster: Developing the Social Identity Model of Crowd Behaviour in Order to Explain the Initiation and Development of Collective Conflict'

In recent years, discussions on the violence of the crowd of football are focused on the violent tendencies of participants, especially the nature and origins of opposing norms held by "fraudulent" fans. In this article I will challenge this trend. The concept of "fraud" is limited to how conflicts at crowd events are summarized, precise conditions of their origins, and explanation of the format they take. To explain these phenomena it is necessary to extend the scope of the survey to include police and fans. In the 1990 World Cup (Italy 90) using events involving British fans, we propose a model that the nature of collective norms and collective conflict is the result of interaction between British supporters and Italy Carribinelli Did. The police believe that all fans are potentially dangerous and believe that conflicts have arisen between fans who first avoided violence by handling fans over time. This example explains the value of collective football's violence analysis in developing community dynamics and suggests a way that a fan's inherently dangerous assumption can become a self-contained prophecy I will.

Prototype motivation model (Gibbons et al., 2003): This model was developed to explain the apparent irrational behavior in adolescence. It has important features to transcend an identity, but identity and identity are at the heart of it. First, many will actions are neither rational nor intentional, suggesting that it is a response to the situation. Secondly, it suggests that health risk behavior is a social behavior of many young people. Third, for this reason, they have a clear social image. These images have a major impact on the decision to participate in action. This led to two important concepts of the theory since prototypes, the social image of adolescent youth who is anxious to be part of their identity, it contains a lack of clear intentions. The situation (Gibbons et al., 2003)

Tajfel and Turner (1979) developed a theory called social identity theory to explain the result. Social identity theory argues that individuals seek to maintain a positive social identity to maintain a positive self-concept (eg, Cooley 1902; Covington and Berry 1976; Rosenberg 1979). Of course, in order to make social identity theory relevant to an individual, he or she must identify with the group. Whether it is good or bad, the individual must feel that he belongs to this group. Even with the smallest group paradigm,

The theory is a strange city map that will help us understand actions and attitudes (lecture record). The theory of social identity was proposed by Tafel and Turner in 1979 and it was called intergroup relationship (text). Social identity theory is a group member and group based association based on the concept of self classification, self comparison, and definition of self definition definitions within the group (text). - The theory of criminal seems to belong to the decline of two major criminal schools. The classical criminal school including reasonable criminals is a positivistic criminal society that affects his criminal behavior and personal life and affects them in a positive or negative way I am aware of the academic outlook.